75 Chinese and 75 American students' perceptual styles of cognitive complexity and scanning (focus versus nonfocus) were analyzed. The American students, 22 Chinese women, and 18 Chinese social science and humanities students scored as more complex than the 53 Chinese men and 57 Chinese natural science and engineering students. It was also observed that the Chinese men and American women scored as more focused than the 22 Chinese women and 43 American men.
References
1.
BieriJ. (1965) Cognitive complexity: assessment issues in the study of cognitive structure. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
2.
BieriJ. (1971) Cognitive structures in personality. In SchroderH. M.SuedfeldP. (Eds.), Personality theory and information processing. New York: Ronald. Pp. 178–208.
3.
CharltonS.BakanP. (1989) Cognitive complexity and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 8, 315–322.
4.
GardnerR. W. (1961) Cognitive controls of attention deployment as determinants of visual illusions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 120–127.
5.
GreenE. K. (1985) Cognitive style: a review of the literature. Technical report, Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation, Human Engineering Laboratory.
6.
HanesT. M. (1991) The relationship of cognitive styles, cognitive profiles, and intelligence among selected adult students enrolled at a community college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Univer. of Wyoming at Laramie.
7.
HolzmanP. S. (1966) Scanning: a principle of reality contact. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 835–844.
8.
LetteriC. A. (1979) Manual of instruments and procedures for testing and constructing cognitive profiles. Burlington, VT: Univer. of Vermont, Center for Cognitive Studies.
9.
MessickS., & Associates. (1976) Individuality in learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
RotterN. G.O'ConnellA. N. (1982) The relationship among sex-role orientation, cognitive complexity, and tolerance for ambiguity. Sex Roles, 8, 1209–1220.
11.
RubinR. B.HenzlS. A. (1984) Cognitive complexity, communication competence, and verbal ability. Communication Quarterly, 32, 263–270.
12.
SchlesingerH. J. (1954) Cognitive attitudes in relation to susceptibility to interference. Journal of Personality, 22, 354–374.
13.
SiscoB. R. (1987) An analysis of the cognitive profiles of selected university adult students. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Adult Education Research Conference. Laramie, WY: The Univer. of Wyoming. Pp. 226–232.
