On Inter- and Intragroup Differences in Schematic and Aschematic Groups' Ratings of Trait Relations

Abstract

It was hypothesized that a subject's personality with respect to having a self-schema in a given personality domain will affect the subject's assumptions about how traits that belong to the given personality domain are interrelated in other persons. Two hypotheses were posed: (1) schematic, as compared to aschematic groups, assume stronger relations (likelihood of co-occurrence) between schema-consistent traits in other persons and (2) schematic persons assume stronger relations between schema-consistent traits, as compared to schema-inconsistent traits and schema-neutral traits in other persons. 82 women made self-ratings on 3 feminine traits, 3 masculine traits, and 3 neutral traits, as well as trait-relation ratings between pairs consisting of feminine traits (F-F relation), masculine traits (M-M relation), and neutral traits (N-N relation). On the basis of the self-ratings subjects were classified into feminine schematic (n = 14) and aschematic groups (n = 13). The trait-relation ratings were analyzed through a 2 × 3 (group × type of trait-relation) analysis of variance. The analysis confirmed both hypotheses. Implications of these results for self-schema and implicit personality theory are discussed, and directions for future research are suggested.

References

Bem

S. L.

(1974) The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

Bem

S. L.

(1981) Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

Borkenau

(1992) Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 295–327.

Bruner

J. S.

Tagiuri

(1954) The perception of people. In Lindzay

(Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 634–654.

Burke

P. A.

Kraut

R. E.

Dworkin

R. H.

(1984) Traits, consistency, and self-schemata: What do our methods measure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 568–579.

Cantor

Mischel

(1977) Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48.

Catrambone

Markus

(1987) The role of self-schemas in going beyond the information given. Social Cognition, 5, 349–368.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1955) Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.” Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193.

Ebbesen

E. B.

Allen

R. B.

(1979) Cognitive processes in implicit personality trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 471–488.

10.

Fekken

G. C.

Holden

R. R.

(1992) Response latency evidence for viewing personality traits as schema indicators. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 103–120.

11.

Fiske

S. T.

Linville

P. W.

(1980) What does the schema concept buy us? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6. 543–557.

12.

Fong

G. T.

Markus

(1982) Self-schemas and judgements about others. Social Cognition, 1, 191–204.

13.

Glass

G. V.

Hopkins

K. D.

(1984) Statistical methods in education and psychology. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

14.

Hamilton

D. L.

(1981) Cognitive representations of persons. In Higgins

E. T.

Herman

C. P.

Zanna

M. P.

(Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 135–159.

15.

Hastie

(1981) Schematic principles in human memory. In Higgins

E. T.

Herman

C. P.

Zanna

M. P.

(Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Vol 1 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 39–88.

16.

Hill

A. B.

Bellew

(1988) The recall of self-congruent and self-incongruent information about the personality of others. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 727–733.

17.

Kim

M. P.

Rosenberg

(1980) Comparison of two structural models of implicit personality theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 375–389.

18.

Koltuv

B. B.

(1962) Some characteristics of intrajudge trait intercorrelations. Psychological Monographs, 76, No. 33 (Whole No. 552).

19.

Landman

Manis

(1983) Social cognition: Some historical and theoretical perspectives. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 16. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 49–123.

20.

Leyens

J-P.

(1991) Prolegomena for the concept of implicit theories of personality. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 131–136.

21.

Markus

(1977) Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

22.

Markus

(1983) Self-knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality, 51, 543–565.

23.

Markus

Crane

Bernstein

Siladi

(1982) Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38–50.

24.

Markus

Smith

(1981) The influence of self-schemata on the perception of others. In Cantor

Kihlstrom

J. F.

(Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 233–262.

25.

Markus

Smith

Moreland

R. L.

(1985) Role of the self-concept in perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.

26.

Markus

Wurf

(1987) The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 38, 299–337.

27.

Nystedt

(1979) An implicit personality theory approach to the prediction of individual judgements. Reports from the Department of Psychology, Univer. of Stockholm, No. 553.

28.

Nystedt

Smari

Boman

(1991) Self-schema: Ambiguous operationalizations of an important concept. European Journal of Personality, 5, 1–14.

29.

Rosenberg

(1977) New approaches to the analysis of personal constructs in person perception. In Landfield

A. W.

(Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 24. Lincoln, NE: Univer. of Nebraska Press. Pp. 179–242.

30.

Rosenberg

Jones

(1972) A method for investigating and representing a person's implicit theory of personality: Theodore Dreiser's view of people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 372–386.

31.

Rosenberg

Nelson

Vivekananthan

P. S.

(1968) A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294.

32.

Rosenberg

Sedlak

(1972) Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 235–297.

33.

Schneider

D. J.

(1973) Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294–309.

34.

Schneider

D. J.

Blankmeyer

B. L.

(1983) Prototype salience and implicit personality theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 712–722.

35.

Schneider

D. J.

Hastorf

A. M.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(1979) Person perception. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

36.

Segal

Z. V.

(1988) Appraisal of the self-schema construct in cognitive models of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 147–162.

37.

Smari

(1984) Self-schemata, self-awareness, and perceived strength of intertrait relationships. (Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Stockholm Univer.).

38.

Smith

S. S.

Kihlstrom

J. F.

(1987) When is a schema not a schema? The “big five” traits as cognitive structures. Social Cognition, 5, 26–57.

39.

SPSS, Inc. (1983) User's guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.

40.

SPSS, Inc. (1985) Advanced statistical guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.

41.

Taylor

S. E.

Crocker

(1981) Schematic bases of social information processing. In Higgins

E. T.

Herman

C. P.

Zanna

M. P.

(Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 89–134.

42.

Todd

F. J.

Rappoport

(1964) A cognitive structure approach to person perception: A comparison of two models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 469–478.

43.

Wegner

D. M.

Vallacher

R. A.

(1977) Implicit psychology: An introduction to social cognition. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.