Early researchers investigating aging have often been accused of forming the foundation for the belief that intelligence peaks in early adulthood and declines steadily thereafter, a concept sometimes known as the classic aging curve. Documentation in this article indicates that at least several early researchers on the subject were actually making very different arguments and that they were well aware of the limitations of their data.
References
1.
AchenbaumW. A. (1995) Crossing frontiers: gerontology emerges as a science. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
2.
BotwinickJ. (1973) Aging and behavior. New York: Springer.
3.
HarrisB. (1979) Whatever happened to Little Albert?American Psychologist, 34, 151–160.
4.
PresseyS. L.JanneyJ. E.KuhlenR. G. (1939) Life: a psychological survey. New York: Harper.
5.
RugerH.StoessigerB. (1927) On the growth curve of certain characters in man. Annals of Eugenics, 2, Parts I and II.
6.
SchaieK. W.WillisS. (1996) Psychometric intelligence and aging. In Blanchard-FieldsF.HessT. (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging. New York: McGraw Hill. Pp. 293–322.
7.
ThorndikeE. L. (1928) Adult learning. New York: Macmillan.
8.
WechslerD. (1958) The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
9.
YerkesR. M. (Ed.) (1921) Psychological examining in the U.S. Army. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences (No. 15.
