The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of perceived threat on expecred course grade, self-efficacy, and motivation. The study required college students to decide whether they perceived their most recent examination grade in a statistics course to be threatening to achievement of their over-all expected course grade and, based on that assessment of threat, subsequently place themselves into one of three feedback categories (positive nonthreatening, negative nonthreatening, or negative outcome-threatening). Expected course grade, self-efficacy, and motivation (intended effort) were assessed before the examination and after feedback had been delivered. Ratings of expected course grade, self-efficacy, and motivation significantly changed from pre- to posttest for subjects who perceived that their goals were threatened.
References
1.
AnnettJ. (1969) Feedback and human behavior. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
2.
ArgoteL.TurnerM. E., & FichmanM. (1989) To centralize or not to centralize: the effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 58–74.
3.
BanduraA. (1977) Self-efficacy, toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
4.
BanduraA., & CervoneD. (1986) Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92–113.
5.
BaronR. A. (1988) Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199–207.
6.
BasgallJ. A., & SnyderC. R. (1988) Excuses in waiting: external locus of control and reactions to success-failure feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 656–662.
7.
BourneL. E.Jr. (1966) Comments on Professor I. M. Bilodeau's paper. In BilodeauE. A. (Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 297–313.
8.
CronbachL. J. (1970) Essentials of psychological testing. (3rd ed.) New York: Harper & Row.
9.
IlgenD. R.FisherC. D., & TaylorM. S. (1979) Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizationspatients of Applied Psychology, 64, 349–371.
10.
JacksonS. E., & DuttonJ. E. (1988) Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370–387.
11.
LearyM. R.BarnesB. D.GriebelC.MasonE., & McCormackD.Jr. (1987) The impact of conjoint threats to social- and self-esteem on evaluation apprehension. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 304–311.
12.
LockeE. A.CartledgeN., & KoeppelJ. (1968) Motivational effects of knowledge of results: a goal-setting phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 474–485.
13.
LockeE. A.FrederickE.LeeC., & BobkoP. (1984) Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251.
14.
LockeE. A., & LathamG. P. (1990) A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
LopezE. M. (1982) A test of the self-consistency theory of the job performance-job satisfaction relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 335–348.
16.
MilburnT. W., & WatmanK. H. (1981) On the nature of threat: a social psychological analysis. New York: Praeger.
17.
NadlerD. A. (1979) The effects of feedback on task group behavior: a review of the experimental research. Organizational behavior and Human Performance, 23, 309–338.
18.
PaulhusD. L. (1991) Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R., & WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Vol. 1. Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes Series. Vol. 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 17–59.
19.
ShraugerJ. S., & RosenbergS. E. (1970) Self-esteem and the effects of success and failure feedback on performance. Journal of Personality, 38, 404–417.
20.
StawB. M.SandelandsL. E., & DuttonJ. E. (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multi-level analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.
21.
TaylorM. S.FisherC. D., & IlgenD. R. (1984) Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: a control theory perspective. In RowlandK. M. & FerrisG. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management. Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 81–124.
