Abstract
This study explored the anchoring effect in judging the grammaticality of sentences violating the subjacency condition. The sentences included either a noun phrase (NP-Extracted) or an adverbial phrase (AP-Extracted), each extracted from a subordinate clause. Anchor sentences had a surface structure similar either to the NP-Extracted targets (NP-Preposed) or to the AP-Extracted targets (AP-Pre-posed). 42 speakers classified as field-dependent judged the two types of target sentences given together with either the NP-Preposed anchors, the AP-Preposed anchors, or no anchors. Regardless of the targets judged, findings showed the contrast effect for speakers given the AP-Preposed anchors. This effect was also found when the speakers given the NP-Preposed anchors judged the AP-Extracted targets. Two factors, over-all rated grammaticality of sentences and surface similarity between anchors and targets, likely operated to produce the outcome.