Responses to two forms of the answer sheet for the Speech-Sounds Perception Test, the standard form and a revised form in which the error types were randomized, were analyzed for 40 subjects. Although there was a statistically significant difference between the forms, practically it was negligible.
References
1.
BornsteinR. A.LeasonM. (1984) Item analysis of Halstead's Speech-Sounds Perception Test: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of errors. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 205–214.
2.
CharterR. A.DutraR. L.LopezM. N.Speech-Sounds Perception Test: Analysis of error types in normal and diffusely brain-damaged patients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1997, 1507–1510.
3.
ReddonJ. R.SchopflocherD.GillD. M.StefanykW. O. (1989) Speech-Sounds Perception Test: Nonrandom response locations form a logical fallacy in structure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 235–240.
4.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1993) The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. (2nd ed.) Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
