Magnitude estimations were obtained for manual assessments of pure elastic stiffness stimuli (metal springs). 20 subjects of varied experience in manual assessment of spinal stiffness volunteered to participate. The mean exponent of the power function relating perceived magnitude of elastic stiffness to measured physical magnitude was 1.65. Exponents varied across the 20 individuals but were stable across testing sessions held at least 2 weeks apart, and the size of the exponent was not related to prior experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdJ. C.BerglundB.BerglundU.LindbergS. (1991) Stimulus sequence and the exponent of the power function for loudness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 3–17.
2.
ChoiS.MeeuwsenH. J.ArnholdR. W. (1995) On the psychophysics of arm-positioning movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 1163–1169.
3.
CoppenF. M. V. (1942) The differential threshold for the subjective judgement of the elastic and plastic properties of soft bodies. British Journal of Psychology, 32, 231–247.
4.
EngelandW.DawsonW. E. (1974) Individual differences in power functions for a 1-week intersession interval. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 349–352.
5.
EngenT.LevyN. (1955) The influence of standards on psychophysical judgements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 5, 193–197.
6.
FagotR. F.PokornyR. (1989) Bias effects on magnitude and ratio estimation power function exponents. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 221–230.
7.
GescheiderG. A. (1997) Psychophysics: The fundamentals. (3rd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
HarperR.StevensS. S. (1964) Subjective hardness of compliant materials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 204–215.
9.
HarverA. (1987) Constancy of individual exponents for category production of inspired lung volume. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 779–785.
10.
HellmanR. P. (1981) Stability of individual loudness functions obtained by magnitude estimation and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 63–70.
11.
JonesL. A.HunterI. W. (1993) A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 343–351.
12.
KatzD. (1938) The judgements of test bakers: A psychological study. Occupational Psychology, 12, 139–148.
13.
LatimerJ.GoodsellM. M.LeeM.MaherC. G.WilkinsonB. N.MoranC. C. (1996) Evaluation of a new device for measuring responses to posteroanterior forces in a patient population: Part 1. Reliability testing. Physical Therapy, 76, 158–165.
14.
LatimerJ.LeeM.AdamsR. D. (1998) The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 21, 157–163.
LogueA. W. (1976) Individual differences in magnitude estimation of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 279–280.
17.
MagillR. A.ParksP. E. (1983) The psychophysics of kinesthesis for positioning responses: The physical stimulus-psychological response relationship. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 346–351.
18.
MaherC. (1995) Perception of stiffness in manipulative physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 11, 35–44.
19.
MaherC.AdamsR. (1995) A psychophysical evaluation of manual stiffness discrimination. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 41, 161–167.
20.
MaitlandG. D. (1986) Vertebral manipulation. London: Butterworth.
21.
MarksL. E. (1974) Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
22.
McKennaE. P. (1985) Another look at the “new psychophysics”. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 97–109.
23.
MellersB. A. (1983) Evidence against “absolute” scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 523–526.
24.
NicholsonL.AdamsR.MaherC. (1997) Reliability of a discrimination measure for judgements of non-biological stiffness. Manual Therapy, 2, 150–156.
25.
NicholsonL.MaherC.AdamsR. (1998) Hand contact area, force applied and early non-linear stiffness (toe) in a manual stiffness discrimination task. Manual Therapy, 3, 212–219.
26.
PoultonE. C. (1989) Bias in quantifying judgements. Hove, Eng.: Erlbaum.
27.
RobinsonG. H. (1976) Biasing power law exponents by magnitude estimation instructions. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 80–84.
28.
RossH. E. (1993) Weight and mass as psychophysical attributes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 606–607.
29.
RussellW. D. (1997) On the current status of rated perceived exertion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 799–808.
30.
Scott-BlairG. W.CoppenF. M. V. (1939) The subjective judgements of the elastic and plastic properties of soft bodies; the “differential thresholds” for viscosities and compression moduli. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 128B, 109–125.
31.
StevensJ. C.TulvingE. (1957) Estimations of loudness by a group of untrained observers. American Journal of Psychology70, 600–605.
32.
StevensS. S. (1975) Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
33.
StevensS. S.GalanterE. H. (1957) Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 377–411.
34.
StevensS. S.GuiraoM. (1964) Scaling of apparent viscosity. Science, 144, 1157–1158.
35.
TeghtsoonianM.TeghtsoonianR, (1971) How repeatable are Stevens's power law exponents for individual subjects?Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 147–149.
36.
TeghtsoonianM.TeghtsoonianR. (1983) Consistency of individual exponents in cross-modal matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 203–214.
37.
TeghtsoonianR. (1973) Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens's law. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 3–27.
38.
VerrilloR. T. (1983) Stability of line-length estimates using the method of absolute magnitude estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 261–265.
39.
WalshJ. K.BrowmanC. R. (1978) Intraindividual consistency on a cross-modality matching task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 210–214.
40.
WardL. M. (1973) Repeated magnitude estimations with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 193–200.
41.
WiestW. M.BellB. (1985) Stevens's exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 457–470.
