In an earlier paper, we had suggested that the research examining the capacity of the unconscious cannot be interpreted unambiguously to make the claim that the unconscious is limited in scope. Fudin and Lembessis challenged our conclusion, and we address their concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DraineS. C. (1997) Analytic limitations of unconscious language processing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 333IB.
2.
FudinR.LembessisE. (1999) Note on Malik and Paraherakis’ (1998) commentary regarding the encoding capacity of the cognitive unconscious. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 264–266.
3.
GreenwaldA. G. (1992) New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766–779.
4.
GreenwaldA. G.LiuT. (1985) Limited unconscious process of meaning. (Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State Univer.).
5.
MalikR.ParaherakisA. (1998) How limited is the unconscious? A brief commentary. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 345–346.
6.
SilvermanL. H. (1983) The subliminal psychodynamic acdvation method. In MaslingJ. (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 69–100.
