In two experiments, 195 Canadian undergraduates initially judged a list of 25 names (12 famous men and 13 nonfamous women or 12 famous women and 13 nonfamous men) for familiarity. Contrary to previous research, subsequent estimates of the perceived number of men's and women's names were not higher when the names were famous than nonfamous. When the estimated differences were compared to the true difference (−1), famous names were judged more numerous than nonfamous names, but the size of the effect (d=0.34) was smaller than in previous research. Reasons for these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenJ. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. (Rev. ed.) New York: Academic Press.
LecheltE. C. (1971) Spatial numerosity discrimination as contingent upon sensory and extrinsic factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 180–184.
4.
LichtensteinS.SlovicP.FischoffB.LaymanM.CombsB. (1978) Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551–578.
5.
McKelvieS. J. (1995) Bias in the estimated frequency of names. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 1331–1338.
6.
McKelvieS. J. (1997) The availability heuristic: Effects of fame and gender on the estimated frequency of male and female names. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 63–78.
7.
McKelvieS. J. (2000) Quantifying the availability heuristic with famous names. North American Journal of Psychology, 2, 347–356.
8.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973) Availability: A heuristic for Judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–302.
