Testing Specificity and Guidance Hypotheses by Manipulating Relative Frequency of KR Scheduling in Motor Skill Acquisition

Abstract

This investigation tested predictions of specificity and guidance hypotheses by manipulating relative frequency of knowledge of results scheduling using a shuffleboard task. Participants were assigned to either a 100%-KR, three 50%-KR conditions (Constant, Fade, Reverse), or 00%-KR condition. Based on predictions of the specificity hypothesis, it was expected the 00%-KR condition would perform the best on a no-KR retention test. It was also expected the 100%-KR condition would perform poorly on a no-KR retention test based on predictions of the guidance hypothesis. Analysis for 55 men's and 55 women's retention did not support predictions of the specificity hypothesis and provided partial support for the guidance hypothesis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

(1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.

Bilodeau

E. A.

Bilodeau

I. M.

ScHumsky

D. A.

(1959) Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–144.

Bilodeau

I. M.

(1966) Information feedback. In Bilodeau

E. A.

(Ed.), The acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 255–296.

Goodwin

J. E.

Meeuwsen

H. J.

(1995) Using bandwidth knowledge of results to alter relative frequencies during motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 99–104.

Henry

F. M.

(1968) Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In Brown

R. C.

Kenyon

G. S.

(Eds.), Classical studies on physical activity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 328–331.

Newell

K. M.

(1976) Knowledge of results and motor learning. In Keogh

Hutton

R. S.

(Eds.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol. 4. Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates. Pp. 195–228.

Nicholson

D. E.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1991) Scheduling information feedback to enhance training effectiveness. [Summary] Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Pp. 1400–1402.

Salmoni

A. W.

Schmidt

R. A.

Walter

C. B.

(1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

10.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1991) Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In Stelmach

G. E.

Requin

(Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Pp. 59–76.

11.

Schmidt

R. A.

Lance

Young

D. E.

(1990) Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 325–348.

12.

Trowbridge

H. M.

Cason

(1932) An experimental study of Thorndike's theory of learning. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 245–260.

13.

Tulving

Thomson

D. M.

(1973) Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.

14.

Winstein

C. J.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1990) Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677–691.