This study examined how young children change their strategies for comparing sizes. 33 5- and 6-yr.-old children were asked to compare the sizes of geometric figures, and their strategies were observed. Children in experimental conditions were also asked to evaluate presented strategies for comparing geometric figures, and half of the children were provided with feedback on the evaluation. Analysis showed children provided with feedback on evaluation showed increased use of the strategy of placing one figure on another.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonN. H.CuneoD. O. (1978) The height + width rule in children's judgments of quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 335–378.
2.
BaroodyA. J. (1984) The case of Felicia: A young child's strategies for reducing memory demands during mental addition. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 109–116.
3.
CuneoD. O. (1980) A general strategy for quantity judgments: The height + width rule. Child Development, 51, 299–301.
4.
MaratsosM. R. (1973) Decrease in the understanding of the word “big” in preschool children. Child Development, 44, 741–752.
5.
MillerK. F. (1984) Child as the measurer of all things: Measurement procedures and the development of quantitative concepts. In SophianC. (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills: The eighteenth annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 193–228.
6.
PlagetJ.InhelderB.SzeminskaA. (1960) The child's conception of geometry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7.
SenaR.SmithL. B. (1990) New evidence on the development of the word big. Child Developmental, 61, 1034–1052.
8.
SieglerR. S.CrowleyK. (1994) Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 194–226.
9.
WilkeningF. (1979) Combination of stimulus dimensions in children's and adults' judgments of area: An information integration analysis. Developmental Psychology. 15, 25–33.
10.
WolfY. (1995) Estimation of Euclidean quantity by 5- and 6 year-old children: Facilitating a multiplication rule. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 49–75.
11.
YuzawaM.BartW. M.KinneL. J.SukemuneS.KataokaM. (1999) The effect of origami practice on size comparison strategies among Japanese and American children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 133–143.
