95 undergraduates read a simulated crime vignette about either murder or theft in which the perpetrator was a 20-, 40-, or 60-yr.-old man, then gave recommendations about sentence and parole. Subsequently, they made a second set of recommendations for the other crime and another age. For combined sets of judgments, punishment was harsher for the murder than for the theft. For murder, the 60-yr.-old and the 20-yr.-old were both treated more leniently than the 40-yr.-old, but the difference was greater for the older than for the younger offender. Researchers should examine age in relation to judgments for different crimes with participants exposed to all experimental conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergeronC. E.McKelvieS. J. (in press) Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for different crimes. The Journal of Social Psychology.
2.
CohenJ. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (Rev. ed.) New York: Academic Press.
3.
GebotysR. J.RobertsJ. V. (1987) Public views of sentencing: the role of the offender. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 19, 479–488.
4.
MazzellaR.FeingoldA. (1994) The effects of physical attractiveness, rape, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1315–1344.
5.
SilvermanM.SmithL. G.NelsonC.DemboR. (1984) The perception of the elderly criminal when compared to juvenile and adult offenders. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 3, 97–104.
6.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998) The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: the punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
