Effect of Five Weeks of Strength and Flexibility Training on Associations between Self-Reported and Performance-Based Measures of Physical Fitness in Older African-American Adults

Abstract

Previous research suggests that older adults' perceptions of personal physical fitness are limited, especially for muscular strength and flexibility, and that these perceptual limitations may be the result of an insufficient referent for discerning appropriate muscular strength and flexibility. This study evaluated whether 5 wk. of strength and flexibility training would provide the additional experiences necessary for older adults to strengthen the correlations between their self-reported and performance-based measures of physical fitness, specifically for the subcomponents of strength and flexibility. Evaluated components were aerobic endurance (maximal distance covered in 6 min.), muscular strength (maximal amount of weighted arm-curls and chair ups), flexibility (back-scratch and modified sit and reach), and body composition (BMI). From a local community center a convenient sample of 20 African-American adults (5 men and 15 women) who ranged in age from 57 to 82 years (M = 68 yr., SD = 5 yr.) volunteered to participate in 5 wk. of strength and flexibility training (twice a week, 60 min. per session). Initially, the absolute value of correlations between self-reported and performance-based measures of physical fitness were low to moderately high (r = .35 to .68) with the greatest correlation found for body composition (r = −.68). After 5 wk. of training, the participants' self-reports of upper body flexibility significantly improved (r = .42 to .70); however, no significant changes were found in self-reports of muscular strength and lower body flexibility. Additional validation of available self-report scales, as well as the development of new and improved self-report ones, is needed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

B. R.

(1988) Construction and validation of a perceived physical fitness scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 887–892.

Clark

B. C.

(1989) Tests for fitness in older adults, AAHPERD Fitness Task Force. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 60, 66–71.

Glass

G. V.

Hopkins

D. D.

(1996) Statistical methods in education and psychology. (3rd ed.) Needham Heights, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.

Jackson

A. S.

Pollock

M. L.

(1978) Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. British Journal of Nutrition, 40, 497–504.

Netz

Argov

(1997) Assessment of functional fitness among independent older adults: a preliminary report. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1059–1074.

Optenberg

S. A.

Lairson

D. R.

Slater

C. H.

Russell

M. L.

(1984) Agreement of self-reported and physiologically estimated fitness status in a symptom-free population. Preventive Medicine, 13, 349–354.

Rikli

R. E.

Jones

C. J.

(1999a) Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6, 363–375.

Rikli

R. E.

Jones

C. J.

(1999b) Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7, 162–181.

Schuler

P. B.

Marzilli

T. S.

(2003) Use of self-reports of physical fitness as substitutes for performance-based measures of physical fitness in older adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 414–420.

10.

van Heuvelen

M. J. G.

Kempen

G. I. J. M.

Ormel

de Greef

M. H. G.

(1997) Self-reported physical fitness of older persons: a substitute for performance-based measure of physical fitness? Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 5, 298–310.