Personality Traits and Achievement Motives: Theoretical and Empirical Relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2009
Personality Traits and Achievement Motives: Theoretical and Empirical Relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale
Theoretical and empirical relations between personality traits and motive dispositions were investigated by comparing scores of 315 undergraduate psychology students on the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale. Analyses showed all NEO Personality Inventory-Revised factors except agreeableness were significantly correlated with the motive for success and the motive to avoid failure. A structural equation model showed that motive for success was predicted by Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Neuroticism (negative relation), and motive to avoid failure was predicted by Neuroticism and Openness (negative relation). Although both achievement motives were predicted by several personality factors, motive for success was most strongly predicted by Openness, and motive to avoid failure was most strongly predicted by neuroticism. These findings extended previous research on the relations of personality traits and achievement motives and provided a basis for the discussion of motive dispositions in personality. The results also added to the construct validity of the Achievement Motives Scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1937) Personality: a psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2.
AlstonW. P. (1975) Traits, consistency and conceptual alternatives for personality theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 5, 17–48.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1957) Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.
5.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1964) An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
6.
AtkinsonJ. W.FeatherN. T. (Eds.) (1966) A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.
7.
AtkinsonJ. W.O'ConnorP. (1966) Neglected factors in studies of achievement-oriented performance: social approval as incentive and performance decrement. In AtkinsonJ. W.FeatherN. T. (Eds.), A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.
8.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.StraussJ. P. (1993) Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715–722.
9.
BøO. O.ChristophersenK. A.RandP. (1980) Factor structure of the achievement motives scale (AMS): IL A replication study. (Report No. 4). Oslo, Norway: Institute for Educational Research. Univer. of Oslo.
10.
BøO. O.RandP. (1979) Factor structure of the Achievement Motives Scale (AMS). (Report No. 5) Oslo, Norway: Institute for Educational Research. Univer. of Oslo.
11.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage. Pp. 445–455.
12.
BusatoV. V.PrinsE. J.ElshoutJ. J.HamakerC. (2000) Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057–1068.
13.
ByrneB. M. (2001) Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Erlbaum.
14.
ChristophersenK. A.RandP. (1982) Factor structure of the achievement motives scale (AMS): two factors-two samples. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 13–28.
15.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (1999) Temperament: a new paradigm for trait psychology. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford. Pp. 399–423.
16.
CockD.HalvariH. (1999) Relations among achievement motives, autonomy, performance in mathematics, and satisfaction of pupils in elementary school. Psychological Reports, 84, 983–997.
17.
CostaP. T. (1996) Work and personality: use of the NEO PI-R in industrial/organizational psychology. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 45, 225–241.
18.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992a) Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13.
19.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992b) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
20.
CraigR. J.LoheidiR. A.RudolphB.LeiferM.RubinN. (1988) Relationship between psychological needs and the five-factor model of personality classification. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 519–527.
21.
EdwardsA. L. (1959) Manual for the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. New York: The Psychological Corp.
22.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
23.
EntwisleD. R. (1972) To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 377–391.
24.
EysenckH. J. (1990) Biological dimensions of personality. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford. Pp. 244–276.
25.
GellatlyI. R. (1996) Conscientiousness and task performance: test of cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 474–482.
26.
GeorgeJ. M.BriefA. P. (1996) Motivational agendas in the workplace: the effects of feelings on focus of attention and work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 75–109.
27.
GjesmeT. (1983a) Motivation to approach success (Ts) and motivation to avoid failure (Tf) at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 145–164.
28.
GjesmeT. (1983b) Worry and emotionality components of test anxiety in relation to situational and personality determinants. Psychological Reports, 52, 267–280.
29.
GjesmeT.NygårdR. (1970) Achievement-related motives: theoretical considerations and construction of a measuring instrument. Unpublished report, Institute for Educational Research, Univer. of Oslo.
30.
GoldbergL. R. (1990) An alternative “Description of Personality”: the Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
31.
HagtvetK. A.BensonJ. (1997) The motive to avoid failure and test anxiety responses: empirical support for integration of two research traditions. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 10, 35–57.
32.
HagtvetK. A.RenminY. (1992) The changing impact of ability, motivation and anxiety in cognitive performance: a process analysis. In ForgaysD. G.SosnowskiT.WrzesniewskiK. (Eds.), Anxiety: recent development in self appraisal, psychophysiological, and health research. New York: Hemisphere. Pp. 63–74.
33.
HagtvetK. A.ZouL. (2000) Conceptual and empirical components of an internal domain study: an illustration in terms of the achievement motives scale. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 49–78.
34.
HalvariH. (1997) Moderator effects of age on the relation between achievement motives and performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 303–318.
35.
HalvariH.KjørmoO. (1999) A structural model of achievement motives, performance approach and avoidance goals and performance among Norwegian Olympic athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 997–1022.
HeckhausenH. (1986) Why some time out may benefit achievement motivation research. In Van den BerckenJ. H. L.De BruynE. E. J.BergenTh. C. M. (Eds.), Achievement and task motivation. Lisse, Holland: Swets & Zeitlinger. Pp. 7–41.
38.
HeggestadE. D.KanferR. (2000) Individual differences in trait motivation: development of the Motivational Trait Questionnaire. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 751–776.
39.
HuL-T.BentlerR. M. (1995) Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 76–99.
40.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999) The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford. Pp. 102–138.
41.
JöreskogK. G. (1993) Testing structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 294–317.
42.
JudgeT. A.IliesR. (2002) Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807.
43.
KuhlJ. (1978) Standard setting and risk preference: an elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation and an empirical test. Psychological Review, 85, 239–248.
44.
LoehlinJ. C. (1992) Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
ManF.NygårdR.GjesmeT. (1994) The Achievement Motives Scale (AMS): theoretical basis and results from a first try-out of a Czech form. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 209–218.
46.
MartinsenØ. (1994) The effect of individual differences in cognitive style and motives in solving insight problems. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 83–96.
47.
MartinsenØ.NordvikH.ØstboL. E. (2003) Norske versjoner av NEO-PI-R og NEO FFI [Norwegian version of NEO-PI-R and NEO FFI]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening [Journal of the Norwegian Psychological Association], 42, 421–422.
48.
McClellandD. C. (1958) Methods of measuring human motivation. In AtkinsonJ. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. Pp. 12–13.
49.
McClellandD. C. (1987) Human motivation. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
50.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W.ClarkR. A.LowellE. L. (1953) The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
51.
McClellandO. G.KoestnerR. (1992) The achievement motive. In SmithG P. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 143–152.
52.
McClellandD. C.LibermanA. M. (1949) The effect of need for achievement on recognition of need-related words. Journal of Personality, 18, 236–252.
53.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1997) Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 825–847.
54.
MeehlP. H. (1990) Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244.
55.
MitchellT. R.DanielsD. (2003) Motivation. In BormanW.G.IlgenD. R.KlimoskiR. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology. Vol. 12. Industrial organizational psychology. New York: Wiley. Pp. 225–254.
56.
MurrayH. A. (1938) Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
57.
NasserF. M. (1997) The performance of regression-based variations of the scree procedure for determining the number of common factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Georgia, Athens, GA.
58.
NygårdR. (1977) Personality, situation, and persistence. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
59.
NygårdR.GjesmeT. (1973) Assessment of achievement motives: comments and suggestions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 17, 39–46.
PervinL. A. (1994) A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103–113.
62.
PiedmontR. L. (1998) The revised NEO Personality Inventory: clinical and research applications. New York: Plenum.
63.
PiedmontR. L.McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1991) Adjective Check List scales and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 630–637.
64.
RandP. (1991) Mestringsmotivasjon: En teoristudie [Achievement Motivation: a theoretical study]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
65.
RaynorJ. O. (1981) Future orientations and achievement motivation: toward a theory of personality functioning and change. In d'YdewalleG.LensW. (Eds.), Cognition in human motivation and learning: [Festschrift for J. R. Nuttin]. Leuven, Holland: Leuven Univer. Press. Pp. 199–233.
66.
ShockN. W.GreulickR. C.AndresR.ArenbergD.CostaP. T.Jr.LakattaE.C.TobinJ. D. (1984) Normal human aging: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of aging. (NIH publication No. 84–254) Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
67.
StagnerR. (1937) Psychology of personality, New York: McGraw-Hill.
68.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
69.
TanakaA.YamauchiH. (2001) A model for achievement motives, goal orientations, intrinsic interest, and academic achievement. Psychological Reports, 88, 123–135.
70.
TellegenA. (1985) Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In TumaA. H.MaserJ. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 681–706.
71.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1993) Behavioral disinhibition versus constraint: a dispositional perspective. In WegnerD. M.PennebakerJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of mental control. New York: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 506–527.
72.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1997) Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 767–793.
