On Deriving Standard Scores for Peer Nominations with Subgroups of Unequal Size

Berkshire J. R. Nelson P. D. Leadership peer ratings related to subsequent proficiency in training and in the fleet. Special Report No. 58–20. Pensacola, Fla.: U. S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, 1958.

Bronfenbrenner U. The measurement of sociometric status, structure and development. Sociometry Monogr., 1945, No. 6.

Bureau of Naval Personnel. Peer ratings as an intermediate criterion of sonarman performance. San Diego, California: U. S. Naval Personnel Research Field Activity, 1955.

Criswell J. H. Notes on the constant frame of reference problem. Sociometry, 1950, 13, 93–107.

Hollander E. P. The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. J. appl. Psychol., 1957, 41, 85–90.

O'Connor W. F. Berkshire J. R. Comparison of the pre-flight OLQ grade and the leadership peer rating as predictors of training failure. Special Report No. 58–16. Pensacola, Fla.: U. S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, 1958.

Pope B. Socio-economic contrasts in children's peer culture prestige values. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1953, 48, 157–220.

Thompson G. G. Bligh H. F. Witryol S. L. A critical examination of several methods of determining levels of social status. J. soc. Psychol., 1951, 33, 13–32.

Wherry R. J. Fryer D. H. Buddy ratings: Popularity contest or leadership criteria? Personnel Psychol., 1949, 2, 147–159.

Williams S. B. Leavitt H. J. Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership. J. consult. Psychol., 1947, 11, 283–291.

Willingham W. W. Estimating the internal consistency of mutual peer nominations. Psychol. Rep., 1959, 5, 163–167.