BittermanM. E.FeddersenW. E.TylerD. W.Secondary reinforcement and the discrimination hypothesis. Amer. J. Psychol., 1953, 66, 456–464.
2.
DufortR. H.KimbleG. A.Changes in response strength and changes in the amount of reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 185–191.
3.
LawsonR.Brightness discrimination performance and secondary reward strength as a function of primary reward amount. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 35–39.
4.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
5.
LoganF. A.BeierE. M.EllisR. A.Effect of varied reinforcement on speed of locomotion. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 260–266.
TylerD. W.WortzE. C.BittermanM. E.The effect of random and alternating partial reinforcement on resistance to extinction in the rat. Amer. J. Psychol., 1953, 66, 57–65.
8.
VoeksV. W.Acquisition of S—R connections: A test of Hull's and Guthrie's theories. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 137–147.
9.
ZeamanD.Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 466–483.