Implementing suggestions from previous work a new procedure of selecting Ss for persuasibility studies was explored. A replication of an earlier attitude change study with procedural modifications confirmed the feasibility of the procedure. Effects of message distance in attitude change studies, with regression effects balanced, supported the Cognitive Dissonance interpretation of attitude change. Extension of this principle was suggested.
References
1.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1957.
2.
GorfeinD. S.Phenomenal regression and the need for control groups in attitude change studies. Psychol. Rep., 1962, 11, 23–24.
3.
GorfeinD. S.Scaling theory and group influence: a re-examination. J. soc. Psychol., in press.
4.
HovlandC. I.Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. Amer. Psychologist, 1959, 14, 8–17.
5.
HovlandC. I., & SherifM.Social judgment.New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1961.
6.
ZimbardoP. G.Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, 86–94.
