Two tests of Hull's reasoning paradigm were conducted. The basic paradigm required that rats be trained to approach goal box C for one incentive and to approach goal boxes B and D for an incentive which differed in quality and/or quantity. It was further required that goal box B serve as the termination of an A-B sequence and the beginning of a B-C sequence. Hull predicted on the basis of the rg mechanism that under test conditions requiring a choice between the A-B route and the A-D route a significant proportion of Ss would make an “insightful” choice of the A-B route. The results were uniformly negative for Hull's prediction. Under these conditions rats do not manifest the ability to assemble separately acquired behavior segments.
References
1.
DeutschJ. A.Inadequacy of Hullian derivations. Psychol. Rev., 1956, 63, 389–399.
2.
HulickaI. M., & JohnsonB. G.Insight vs conditioning. J. genet. Psychol., 1958, 92, 127–131.
3.
HullC. L.The mechanism of the assembly of behavior segments in novel combinations suitable for problem solution. Psychol. Rev., 1935, 42, 219–245.
JonesC. A.Jr.A test of Hull's mechanism of the assembly of behavior segments in novel combinations suitable for problem solution. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Southern Methodist Univer., 1959.
6.
KoronakosC.Inferential learning in rats: the problem-solving assembly of behavior segments. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1959, 52, 231–235.
7.
MaierN. R. F.Reasoning in white rats. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 1929, 6, 1–93.
8.
OsgoodC. E.Method and theory in experimental psychology.New York: Oxford Univer. Press, 1953.
9.
WolfeJ. B., & SpraggS. D. S.Some experimental tests of reasoning in white rats. J. comp. Psychol., 1934, 18, 255–269.
