Six rats with bipolar electrodes chronically implanted were trained to press a lever to deliver a brief electric shock via the electrodes to the hypothalamus. The rats were subsequently allowed to maintain the current “on” for as long as the lever was depressed. Under this condition, mean response duration was found to be a decreasing, negatively accelerated function of frequency (pps). These results were discussed in the light of recent findings by Stein of a similar relationship with respect to stimulus intensity.
References
1.
GengerelliJ. A.PriddyR. D.AverillJ. R.Studies in the neurophysiology of learning: VII. Bar-pressing rate for cranial self-stimulation as related to frequency of rectangular pulses when Q is held constant. J. Psychol., 1963, 56, 455–472.
HodosW.ValensteinE. S.An evaluation of response rate as a measure of rewarding intracranial stimulation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 80–84.
4.
KeeseyR. E.The relation between pulse frequency, intensity and duration and the rate of responding for intracranial stimulation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 671–678.
5.
OldsJ.Hypothalamic substrates of reward. Physiol. Rev., 1962, 42, 554–604.
6.
OldsJ.MilnerP.Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal areas and other regions of the brain. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 419–427.
7.
OldsJ.TravisR. P.SchwingR. C.Topographic organization of hypothalamic self-stimulation functions. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 23–32.
8.
SteinL.An analysis of stimulus duration preference in self-stimulation of the brain. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 405–414.
9.
SteinL.RayO. S.Brain stimulation reward “thresholds” self-determined in rat. Psychopharmacologia, 1960, 1, 251–256.
10.
ValensteinE. S.A note on anesthetizing rats and guinea pigs. J. exp. anal. Behav., 1961, 4, 6.
11.
WardH. P.Stimulus factors in septal self-stimulation. Amer. J. Physiol., 1959, 196, 779–782.
