Priest maintains that all relevant studies prior to his own support a reference group theory of humor. However, only La Fave's experiment does unequivocally. Both the Wolff, Smith, and Murray and the Middleton experiments make methodological errors, acknowledged by the authors themselves, which render a reference group interpretation of their data debatable. However, these authors also furnish perceptive, post mortem analyses which suggest that, were their methodologies less inadequate, the reference group construct would have won support
References
1.
HymanH.The psychology of status. Arch. Psychol., 1942, No. 269.
2.
La FaveL.Humor judgments as a function of reference groups: an experimental study. Dissert. Abstr., 1961, 22, 1284.
3.
MiddletonR.Negro and white reactions to racial humor. Sociometry, 1959, 22, 175–183.
4.
PriestR. F.Election jokes: the effects of reference group membership. Psychol. Rep., 1966, 18, 600–602.
5.
WolffH. A.SmithC. E.MurrayH. A.The psychology of humor: a study of the responses to race disparagement jokes. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1934, 28, 341–365.