Under widely distributed practice in a straight alley, partially reinforced goldfish did not exhibit greater resistance to extinction than consistently reinforced animals. The relative influence of equating trials or reinforcements in generating the partial reinforcement effect could not be evaluated since the partially reinforced Ss were significantly less resistant than either the equated-reinforcement Ss or the equated-trials Ss.
References
1.
GellermannL. W.Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J. genet. Psychol., 1933, 42, 206–208.
2.
GonzalezR. C.BehrendE. R.BittermanM. E.Partial reinforcement in the fish: experiments with spaced trials and partial delay. Amer. J. Psychol., 1965, 78, 198–207.
3.
GonzalezR. C.EskinR. M.BittermanM. E.Extinction in the fish after partial and consistent reinforcement with number of reinforcements equated. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 381–386.
4.
LongoN.BittermanM. E.The effect of partial reinforcement with spaced practice on resistance to extinction in the fish. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1960, 53, 169–172.
5.
SheffieldC. F.Extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 511–526.
6.
WeinstockS.Resistance to extinction of a running response following partial reinforcement under widely spaced trials. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 318–322.
7.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
8.
WodinskyJ.BittermanM. E.Partial reinforcement in the fish. Amer. J. Psychol., 1959, 72, 184–199.
