15 rats were trained to run in a straight runway for rewarding brain stimulation (ESB). A consistent color of goal box—ESB reward pairing existed during runway training. When subsequently rested in a T-maze where the goal box associated with ESB was placed on the initially nonpreferred side, Ss learned to run to that side with only the goal-box color as the reward. The results are held to conclusively demonstrate that secondary reward can be based on ESB as a primary reward. Also, results appear to challenge the view that drive is necessary for the demonstration of secondary reward.
References
1.
GallistelC. R.Electrical self-stimulation and its theoretical implications. Psychol. Bull., 1964, 61, 23–34.
2.
HallJ. F.The psychology of learning. New York: Lippincott, 1966.
3.
KnottP. D.ClaytonK. N.Durable secondary reinforcement using brain stimulation as the primary reinforcer. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1966, 61, 151–153.
4.
KriegW. J.Accurate placement of minute lesions in the brain of the albino rat. Quart. Bull. Northwest. Univer. Med. Sch., 1946, 20, 199–208.
5.
MogensonG. J.An attempt to establish secondary reinforcement with rewarding brain stimulation. Psychol. Rep., 1965, 16, 163–167.
6.
PankseppJ.TrowillJ. A.Intra-oral injection: II. The simulation of self-stimulation phenomena with a conventional reward. Psychon. Sci., 1967, 9, 407–408.
7.
SaltzmanJ. P.Maze learning in the absence of primary reinforcement: A study of secondary reinforcement. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1949, 42, 161–173.
8.
SewardJ. P.UyedaA. A.OldsJ.Resistance to extinction following cranial self-stimulation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1959, 52, 294–299.
9.
SteinL.Secondary reinforcement established with subcortical stimulation. Science, 1958, 127, 466–467.
10.
TrowillJ. A.PankseppJ.GandelmanR.An incentive model of rewarding brain stimulation. Psychol. Rev., 1969, 76, 264–281.
