An unrecognized implication of Rock's (1957) analysis of paired-associate learning is that a most efficient way of learning a list is to begin with a single pair and add a pair each trial until the whole list is learned. A list of 17 difficult, single-lettered, 2-digit number pairs was used. 18 control Ss received all pairs for 9 trials, while 18 experimental Ss used the add-a-pair method. By the last trial and 153 exposures each, experimental Ss knew 9.72 pairs compared to 6.78 for controls, a significant advantage.
References
1.
BattigW. F.SperaA. J.Rated association value of numbers from 0–100. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1962, 1, 200–202.
2.
HaysW. L.Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
3.
LiebermanL. R.The active gap: An application to the incremental versus one-trial controversy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univer. of Kentucky, 1964.
4.
RestleF.Significance of all-or-none learning. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 313–325.
5.
RockI.The role of repetition in associative learning. American Journal of Psychology, 1957, 70, 186–193.