Abstract
The effectiveness of the respective defensive orientations of repressors (n = 24) and sensitizers (n = 24) in reducing autonomic stress was studied. In an experimental interview, heart rate and GSR were recorded during 90-sec. intervals prior to stress induction (Rest), as Ss received self-discrepant information (Stress), and following microcounseling (Resolution). Male college students with repressing and sensitizing defenses were presented with low “maturity” scores from a test profile (Stress), producing significant elevation of heart rate and GSR above Res: levels. Microcounseling was provided to help Ss reduce autonomic stress. Heart rate and GSR significantly decreased following microcounseling (Resolution) but remained significantly higher than Rest levels in both groups. Stress to Resolution change scores on autonomic variables were not significantly different in these groups indicating efficiency of both repressing and sensitizing defensive orientations in reducing stress. It was hypothesized that “defensive failure” in sensitizers may occur when threat is vague and in the absence of others to help structure ambiguous and confusing interpersonal experiences.