Rats were trained to traverse a straight alley for either 1 or 10 food pellets as reward. Each runway trial was preceded by an intertrial reinforcement of 1 or 10 pellets. A negative contrast effect obtained and persisted throughout the 72 trials conducted. Although there was a strong suggestion of a positive contrast effect throughout training, the effect did not prove reliable. The contrast effect results were interpreted as challenging the view that with extended training ITRs become “irrelevant” to runway reward.
References
1.
BlackR. W.Shifts in magnitude of reward and contrast effects in instrumental and selective learning. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 114–126.
2.
BlackR. W.SpenceK. W.Effects of intertrial reinforcement on resistance to extinction following extended training. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965, 70, 559–563.
3.
CapaldiE. J.A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1967. Pp. 67–156.
4.
CapaldiE. J.HartD.StanleyL. R.Effect of intertrial reinforcement on the aftereffect of nonreinforcement and resistance to extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 70–74.
5.
CapaldiE. J.OliverW. P.Effect of intertrial reinforcement following a substantial number of consistently reinforced trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 75, 135–138.
6.
CapaldiE. J.SpiveyJ. E.Effects of goal-box similarity on the aftereffect of nonreinforcement and resistance to extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 461–465.
7.
SpenceK. W.PlattJ. R.MatsumotoR.Intertrial reinforcement and the partial reinforcement effect as a function of number of training trials. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 3, 205–206.
