In the paired-associate literature negative transfer paradigms, e.g., (A—B, A—C), impede List 1 recall. Positive transfer paradigms, e.g., (A—B, A—B synonym), do not contribute to List 1 forgetting. In this study poems (Haiku) were manipulated to be analogous to paired-associate paradigms. Similar to the paired-associate findings for mixed-lists (several conditions present in one list), List 2 synonyms did not contribute to List 1 forgetting, but, contrary to expectations, neither did antonyms. With meaningful materials Ss may attach discriminating tags to the synonyms and antonyms permitting the application of appropriate transfer rules.
References
1.
BarnesJ. M.UnderwoodB. J.“Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 97–105.
2.
BirnbaumI. M.Unlearning: Specific or contextual. Unpublished paper presented at Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Mo., 1969.
3.
CerasoJ.An experimental critique of competition of response and specific interference as factors in retroactive inhibition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New School for Social Research, 1959.
4.
FillenbaumS.Verbal satiation and the exploration of meaning relations. In SalzingerK.SalzingerS. (Eds.), Research in verbal behavior and some neurophysiological implications. New York: Academic Press, 1967. Pp. 155–166.
5.
MartinE.Verbal learning theory and independent retrieval phenomena. Psychol. Rev., 1971, 78, 314–332.
6.
PostmanL.StarkK.Role of response availability in transfer and interference. J. exp. Psychol., 1969, 79, 168–177.
7.
WeissE.Stimulus category cue and list difficulty as determinants of the amount of transfer. J. exp. Psychol., 1967, 73, 446–449.
8.
WickensD. D.CermackL. S.Transfer effects of synonyms and antonyms in a mixed and unmixed list design. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 1967, 6, 832–839.
