80 salesmen were randomly assigned to one of two survey conditions. In one the interviewer represented himself as from a local University and in the other the interviewer said he represented Marketing Facts, a fictitious firm. The more trustworthy source resulted in a significantly higher response rate.
References
1.
BrunnerG. A.CarrollS. J.Jr.The effect of prior telephone appointments on completion rates and response content. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1967–1968, 31, 652–654.
2.
BrunnerG. A.CarrollS. J.Jr.The effect of prior notification on the refusal rate in fixed address surveys. Journal of Advertising Research, 1969, 9, 42–44. (a)
3.
BrunnerG. A.CarrollS. J.Jr.Weekday evening interviews of employed persons are better. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1969, 33, 265–267. (b)
4.
FalthzikA. M.CarrollS. J.Jr.Rate of return for closed versus open-ended questions in a mail questionnaire survey of industrial organizations. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 1121–1122.
5.
GannonM. J.NothernJ. C.CarrollS. J.Jr.Characteristics of nonrespondents among workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 586–588.
6.
KerlingerF. N.Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
7.
PartenM.Surveys, samples and polls. New York: Harper, 1950.
8.
StephanF.McCarthyP. J.Sampling opinions. New York: Wiley, 1958.
