This research investigated the relationship between attitudes toward the feminine role and personal space in 72 college women (19.5 yr.). Subjects were classified as either feminists or traditionals according to their measured attitudes. Traditional women did not differ from feminists in their approach behavior to other females but remained a greater distance from males than did the feminists. Feminists saw themselves as more aggressive and more potent than the traditionals rated themselves.
References
1.
BaileyK. G.HartnettJ. J.GibsonF. W.Jr.Implied threat and the territorial factor in personal space. Psychological Reports, 1972, 30, 263–270.
2.
BakerB. J.Acceptance versus rejection of the traditional feminine role: Consideration of women's liberation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 33, 2157–2158.
3.
ChernisC.Personality and ideology a personological study of women's liberation. Psychiatry, 1972, 35, 109–125.
4.
DoseyM.MeiselsM.Personal space and self-protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 93–97.
5.
FowlerM. G.Van De RietH. K.Women today and yesterday: An examination of the feminist personality. Journal of Psychology, 1972, 82, 269–276.
6.
HartnettJ. J.BaileyK. G.GibsonF. W.Personal space as influenced by sex and type of movement. Journal of Psychology, 1970, 76, 139–144.
7.
HorowitzM.DuffD.StrattonL.The body buffer zone: An exploration of personal space. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1964, 11, 651–656.
8.
McKenzieS. P.A comparative study of feminine role perceptions, selected personality characteristics and traditional attitudes of professional women and housewives. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 32, 5615–5616.
9.
PawlickiR. E.AlmquistC.Authoritarianism, locus of control, and tolerance of ambiguity as reflected in membership and nonmembership in a women's liberation group. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 1331–1337.
