The present article is a follow-up of Thurstone's study, published 50 yr. ago, concerning the perceived seriousness of crimes. Comparisons were also made with Coomb's follow-up study from the mid-sixties. The continuing trend toward the judgment of sex offenses as less serious and offenses against the person as more serious was observed. The obtained scale also showed heightened sensitivity of subjects to offenses such as burglary, libel, counterfeiting, and forgery, reflecting the prevailing public opinion during the political trials of the mid-seventies.
References
1.
CoombsC. H.Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 85–91.
2.
EdwardsA. L.Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
3.
KrusD. J.Fortran program for the domain-referenced scaling of the unidimensional dominance matrices. Arizona State University, University Testing Services: Technical Reports, 1976, 8, 1–35.
4.
KrusD. J.KrusP. H.Lost: McCall's T scores: Why?Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, 37, in press.
5.
McCallW. A.How to measure in education. New York: Macmillan, 1922.
6.
ThurstoneL. L.A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 1927, 34, 273–286. (a)
7.
ThurstoneL. L.The method of paired comparisons for social values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1927, 21, 384–400. (b)
