238 drivers were observed at intersections where yielding right-of-way was specified by new traffic regulations introduced 5 wk. prior to the study. 62% of the sample failed to comply with the new regulations. Female drivers were significantly more compliant than were male drivers. The most compliant group were female drivers when the other driver was male. There were no differences among other driver-sex combinations. Driver's age and the type of vehicle having right-of-way did not affect yielding rates.
References
1.
AllenV. L.Situational factors in conformity. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 133–175.
2.
BarchA. M.TrumboD.NangleJ.Social setting and conformity to a legal requirement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 396–398.
3.
BlakeR. R.MoutonJ. S.Conformity, resistance and conversion. In BergI. A.BassB. M. (Eds.), Conformity and deviation. New York: Harper & Row, 1961. Pp. 1–37.
4.
BlomgrenG. W.ScheunemanT. W.WilkinsJ. L.Effect of exposure to a safety poster on the frequency of turn signalling. Traffic Safety, 1963, 7, 15–22.
5.
BrownI. D.CopemanA. K.Drivers' attitudes to the seriousness of road traffic offences considered in relation to the design of sanctions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1975, 7, 15–26.
6.
ClellandE. A.KirkhamR.The relative involvement of young drivers in traffic accidents. Research Reports, University of Western Australia, August1971, No. 2.
7.
CoppinR. S.FerdunG. S.PeckR. C.The teen-aged driver; an evaluation of age, experience, driving exposure, and driver training as they related to driving record. California Department of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento, Calif., 1965.
8.
EbbesenE. B.HaneyM.Flirting with death: variables affecting risk-taking at intersections. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 3, 303–324.
9.
EndlerN. S.Conformity as a function of differential reinforcement schedules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 175–180.
10.
FeestJ.Compliance with legal regulations, observation of stop sign behaviour. Law and Society Review, 1968, 2, 447–461.
KatzA.ZaidelD.ElgrishiA.An experimental study of driver and pedestrian interaction during the crossing conflict. Human Factors, 1975, 17, 514–527.
13.
KonečniV. J.EbbesenE. B.KonečniD. K.Decision processes and risk-taking in traffic: driver response to the onset of yellow light. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 359–367.
14.
LeffJ.GunnJ.The interaction of male and female car drivers at roundabouts. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1973, 5, 253–259.
15.
NordW. R.Social exchange theory: an integrative approach to social conformity. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 174–208.
16.
PelzD. C.SchumanS. H.Are young drivers really more dangerous after controlling for exposure and experience?Journal of Safety Research, 1971, 3, 68–79.
17.
SchenkS.SchmidtG.Psychological analysis of the apparent distribution of trolley-car accidents in a metropolitan area. German Problem und Ergebrusse der Psychologie, 1972, No. 40, 49–68.
18.
SigelmanC. K.SigelmanL.Authority and conformity: violation of a traffic regulation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1976, 99, 35–44.
19.
SistrunkF.McDavidJ.W. Sex variables in conforming behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 200–207.
20.
SolidayS. M.Development of and preliminary testing of a driving hazard questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 41, 763–770.
21.
TorneyJ. V.Socialization of attitudes towards the legal system. Journal of Social Issues, 1971, 27, 137–154.
22.
UhrL.Sex as a determinant of driving skills: women drivers!Journal of Applied Psychology, 1959, 43, 35.
