A model is presented in which two cognitive style factors are seen to account for creative expression. Data are presented which replicate a strong inverse relationship between one of these factors, preference for the abstract, and dogmatism. Dogmatism was unrelated to the other dimension, preference for unstructured stimuli, among two samples of college undergraduates (ns = 30 and 40). Based on these data and available literature the authors argue that failure to develop formal operational, abstract thinking leaves a person especially vulnerable to dogmatic dependence on authority figures. Such a cognitive view of the etiology of dogmatism suggests education as a reasonable alternative to environmental manipulation in reducing bias.
References
1.
AdamsD.HarveyO.HeslinR.Variation in flexibility and creativity as a function of hypnotically induced past histories. In HarveyO. J. (Ed.), Experience, structure, and adaptability. New York: Springer, 1966. Pp. 217–234.
2.
AdornoT.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.SanfordN.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper, 1950.
3.
AllportG.KramerB.Some roots of prejudice. Journal of Psychology, 1946, 22, 9–39.
4.
BettinghausE.MillerG.SteinfattT.Source evaluations, syllogistic content, and judgments of logical validity by high- and low-dogmatic persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 238–244.
5.
BieriJ.BlackerE.The generality of cognitive complexity in the perception of people and inkblots. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 53, 112–117.
6.
BrightmanH.UrbanT.The influence of the dogmatic personality upon information processing: A comparison with a Bayesian information processor. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 11, 266–276.
7.
BrovermanD.BrovermanI.KlaiberE.Ability to automatize and automatization cognitive style: A validation study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 23, 419–437.
8.
BrovermanD.LazarusR.Individual differences in task performance under conditions of cognitive interference. Journal of Personality, 1958, 26, 94–105.
9.
BurnettD.Dogmatism, cognitive complexity, and trait anxiety: A study of interrelationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International Univer., 1973. (Dissert. Abstr. Internal., 1973, 33, Order No. 73-22, 656).
FaschingbauerT.EglevskyD.Relation of dogmatism to creativity: Origence and intellectence. Psychological Reports, 1977, 40, 391–394.
12.
GrossmanJ.EisenmanR.Experimental manipulation of authoritarianism and its effect on creativity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 238–244.
13.
HarveyO. J.System structure, flexibility, and creativity. In HarveyO. J. (Ed.), Experience, structure and adaptability. New York: Springer, 1966. Pp. 39–65.
14.
HarveyO. J.HuntD.SchroderH.Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley, 1961.
15.
HarveyO. J.WareR.Personality differences in dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 227–230.
16.
HolzmanP.The relation of assimilation tendencies in visual, auditory, and kinesthetic time-error to cognitive attitudes of leveling and sharpening. Journal of Personality, 1954, 27, 375–394.
17.
HurleyJ.The relationship of dogmatism with two measures of originality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston Univer., 1970. (Dissert. Abstr. Internal., 1970, 30, Order No. 70-22, 511).
18.
HyramG.An experiment in developing critical thinking in children. Journal of Experimental Education, 1957, 26, 125–132.
19.
JacobyJ.Open-mindedness and creativity. Psychological Reports, 1967, 22, 822.
20.
KerlingerF.RokeachM.The factorial structure of the F and D scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 391–399.
21.
LaPiereR. T.Attitudes versus action. Social Forces, 1934, 13, 230–237. [Reprinted In FishbeinM. (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1967. Pp. 26–31.].
22.
LawsonA.BlakeA.NordlandF.Training effects and generalization of the ability to control variables in high school biology students. Science Education, 1975. 59, 387–396.
23.
LeebS.Empirical application of a cognitive framework to rigidity aspects of creativity, anxiety, and adjustment. Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 651–668.
24.
LinnM.ThierH.The effect of experiential science on development of logical thinking in children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1975, 12, 49–62.
25.
LoomisH.MaskowitzS.Cognitive style and stimulus ambiguity. Journal of Personality, 1958, 25, 349–364.
NeimarkE.Intellectual development during adolescence. In HorowitzF. (Ed.), Review of child development research. Vol. 4. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1975. Pp. 541–594.
28.
NidorfL.ArgabriteA.Dogmatism, sex of the subject, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1968, 32, 585–588.
29.
NoppeL.GallagherJ.A cognitive style approach to creative thought. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977, 41, 85–90.
30.
OhnmachtF.McMorrisR.Creativity as a function of field independence and dogmatism. Journal of Psychology, 1971, 79, 165–168.
31.
PeelE. A.The nature of adolescent judgment. London: Staples, 1971.
32.
PerryW. G.Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.
33.
PhillipsJ.The origins of intellect, Piaget's theory. (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
34.
PiagetJ.InhelderB.The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
35.
RokeachM. (Ed.) The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
36.
RokeachM.In pursuit of the creative process. In SteinerG. (Ed.), The creative organization. Chicago, Ill.: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1965. Pp. 66–88.
37.
RouffL.Openness, creativity, and complexity. Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 1009–1010.
38.
RubleyV.An investigation of formal operational thought and dogmatism during the transition between adolescence and adulthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Iowa, 1973. (Dissert. Abstr. Internat., 1973, 33, Order No. 73-680).
39.
SchlesingerH.Cognitive attitudes in relation to susceptibility to interference. Journal of Personality, 1954, 22, 354–374.
40.
SeveryL.BrighamJ.Personality, prejudice and voting behavior under conditions of high involvement. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Denver, May, 1971.
41.
StarbirdD.BillerH.An exploratory study of the interaction of cognitive complexity, dogmatism, and repression-sensitization among college students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1976, 128, 227–232.
42.
UhesM.ShaverJ.Dogmatism and divergent-convergent abilities. Journal of Psychology, 1970.75, 3–11.
43.
VaccN.GreenleafW.Sequential development of cognitive complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 41, 319–322.
44.
WareR.HarveyO.A cognitive determinant of impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 38–44.
45.
WelshG.Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach. Chapel Hill, N. C.: Institute for Research in Social Science, 1975.
46.
WitkinH.DykR.FatersonH.GoodenoughD.KarpS.Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.
47.
WitkinH.OltmanP.RaskinEKarpS.A manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1971.
