The purpose of this paper was to provide information which might prove useful in the interpretation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A sample of 209 students provided self-descriptions from the adjectives on the Adjective Check List and took the Myers-Briggs. On the basis of Myers-Briggs scores the sample was divided by sex into groups of extraverts and introverts, sensing and intuitive, thinking and feeling, and judging and perceiving types. Adjectives characteristic of males and females in each group were derived by means of chi-square.
References
1.
CooperJ.ScoliseC. J.Dissonance produced by deviations from life styles: The interaction of Jungian typology and conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 566–571.
InselG. A.ReeseC. S.AlexanderB. J.Self-presentations in relation to internal and external referents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 389–395.
4.
JungC. G.Two essays on analytical psychology. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univer. Press, 1966.
5.
JungC. G.Psychological types. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univer. Press, 1971.
RossJ.The relationship between a Jungian personality inventory and tests of ability, personality, and interest. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1966, 18, 1–17.
8.
SteeleR. S.KellyI. J.Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Jungian Myers-Briggs Type Indicator correlation of extraversion intraversion. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 690–691.
9.
StrickerL. J.RossJ.Intercorrelations and reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator scales. Psychological Reports, 1963, 12, 287–293.
10.
StrickerL. J.RossJ.An assessment of some structural properties of the Jungian personality typology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 62–71. (a).
11.
StrickerL. J.RossJ.Some correlates of a Jungian personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 1964, 14, 623–643. (Monogr. Suppl. 6-V14) (b).
12.
StrickerL. J.ShiffmanH.RossJ.Prediction of college performance with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1965, 25, 1081–1095.
13.
WhittemoreR. C.HetmanR. A.Originality responses in academically talented male university freshmen. Psychological Reports, 1965, 16, 439–442.
