Maternal expectancies and their effect on the interaction between mothers and daughters and mothers and sons were studied in 74 mother-child pairs. Analysis indicated that expectancy is not a unitary concept that can always be measured in one way and that there is a different quality of relationship between mothers and their daughters and between mothers and their sons. These sex differences involve both present and future expectations and are expressed by different behavior on the part of mothers towards their sons and daughters.
References
1.
BalesR. F.Interaction process analyses. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1950.
2.
BeaH. L.Parent-child interaction and distractibility in 9-year-old children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1967, 13, 175–190.
3.
BingE.Effect of child-rearing practices on development of differential cognitive abilities. Child Development, 1963, 34, 631–648.
4.
BlishenB. R.The construction and use of an occupational class scale. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1958, 24, 521–531.
5.
BlockJ. H.Issues, problems, and pitfalls in assessing sex differences: A critical review of the “Psychology of Sex Differences.”Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1976, 22, 283–308.
6.
CrandallV. C.Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In SmithC. P. (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children. New York: Russell Sage Found., 1968. Pp. 11–45.
7.
CrandallV. J.DeweyR.KatkovskyW.PrestonA.Parents' attitudes and behaviors and grade school children's academic achievements. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1964, 104, 53–66.
8.
DarmofallS. H.McCarburyR. J.Achievement orientation in females: A social psychological perspective. Psychological Record, 1979, 29, 15–41.
9.
DixonW. J. (Ed.) BMD—Biomedical Computer Programs. Berkeley: Univer. of California Press, 1970. (a)
10.
DixonW. J. (Ed.) BMD—Biomedical Computer Programs, X—Series Supplement. Berkeley: Univer. of California Press, 1970. (b)
11.
MaccobyE. E.JacklinC. N.Psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univer. Press, 1974.
12.
McClellandD. C.The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1961.
13.
McCordJ.McCordW.Cultural stereotypes and the validity of interviews for research in child development. Child Development, 1961, 32, 171–185.
14.
QuarringtonB.SeligmanJ.KosowerE.Goal-setting behavior of parents of beginning stutterers and parents of nonstuttering children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1969, 12, 435–442.
15.
RamsayJ. O.CaseB.Attitude measurement and the linear model. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 185–192.
RotterJ. B.Level of aspiration as a method of studying personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1942, 31, 410–422.
18.
ShapiroJ. G.Relationships between expert and neophyte ratings of therapeutic conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 87–89.
19.
SmithC. P.The origin and expression of achievement-related motives in children. In SmithC. P. (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children. New York: Russell Sage Found., 1969. Pp. 102–150.
20.
SolomonD.PareliusR. J.BusseT. V.Dimensions of achievement-related behavior among lower-class Negro parents. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1969, 79, 163–190.
21.
SteinA. H.BaileyM. M.The socialization of achievement orientation in females. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 345–366.
22.
YarrowM. R.Problems of methods in parent-child research. Child Development, 1963, 34, 215–226.
