1266 students participated in an interview on sensitive issues. Three very sensitive hypothetical situations were assessed by means of three methods, the direct questionnaire, the randomized-response technique, and a “most people” projective-form questionnaire. The data indicate that the first two methods yielded similar proportions of endorsement. However, the projective method yielded much higher proportions of endorsement. These data indicate that the former two methods seem to assess the same concept which is quite different from the one measured through the projective questionnaire. Since the randomized-response method assures the subjects of the confidentiality of their responses, the authors believe that the direct questionnaire and randomized-response data are closer to reality, that is, more valid.
References
1.
BéginG.SavardF.La technique de la réponse aléatoire: un moyen de contrôler la désirabilité sociale dans la mesure de l'estime de soi. Bulletin de Psychologie, 1979, 33, 121–126.
2.
BelleroseJ.BéginG.FrenetteC.DeMontignyC.La technique de la réponse aléatoire: un moyen facile de jauger l'authenticité des auto-enregistrements des sujets. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 1980, 12, 98–103.
3.
BoruchR. F.Relations among statistical methods for assuring confidentiality of social research data. Social Sciences Research, 1972, 1, 403–414.
4.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
5.
CoopersmithS.The antecedents of self-esteem. London: Freedman, 1967.
6.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD.The approval motive. New York: Wiley, 1964.
7.
EdwardsA. L.The social desirability in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden, 1957.
8.
FidlerD. S.KleinknechtR. E.Randomized response versus direct questioning. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 1045–1049.
9.
FolsomR. E.GreenbergB. G.HorvitzD. G.AbernathyJ. R.The two alternative questions randomized response model for human survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1973, 64, 520–539.
10.
GreenbergB. G.AbernathyJ. R.HorvitzD. G.A new survey technique and its application in the field of public health. Milbank Memory Fund Quarterly, 1970, 48, 39–55.
11.
GreenbergB. G.Abul-ElaA. L. A.SimmonsW. R.HorvitzD. G.The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1969, 64, 520–539.
12.
GreenbergB. G.KueblerR. R.Jr.AbernathyJ. R.HorvitzD. G.Application of the randomized response model: theoretical framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1971, 66, 243–250.
13.
HersonM.BarlowD. H.Single-case experimental designs. New York: Pergamon, 1976.
14.
HorvitzD. G.GreenbergB. G.AbernathyJ. R.Recent developments in randomized response designs. In StrivastavaJ. N. (Ed.), A survey of statistical designs and linear models. New York: American Elsevier, 1975. Pp. 46–69.
15.
KraemerH. C.Estimation and testing of bivariate association using data generated by the randomized response technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 304–308.
16.
LiuP. T.ChowL. P.A new discrete quantitative randomized response model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976, 71, 72–73.
17.
MaccobyE. E.MaccobyN.The interview: a tool of social service. In LindzeyG. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954. Pp. 449–487.
18.
MoorsJ. J. A.Optimization of the unrelated question randomized response technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976, 71, 72–73.
19.
SelltizC.WrightsmanI. S.CookS. W.Les méthodes de recherche en sciences sociales. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1977.
20.
SmithG. H.Motivation research in advertising and marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
21.
WarnerS. L.Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60, 63–69.
22.
WebbE. J.CampbellD. T.SchwartzR. D.SechrestL.Unobtrusive measures: nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
