The results of an analysis of responses to the Animal and Opposite Drawing Technique are presented for 134 male and female college students matched on age and education. The majority of both men and women drew same-sexed animals first, and just over half drew second animals which they identified as being of the opposite sex of their first drawings. Implications for the use of this technique to assess an individual's gender identity and other prominent concerns are discussed.
References
1.
DouvanE.New sources of conflict in females at adolescence and early adulthood. In BardwickJ.DouvanE.HornerM.GutmannD. (Eds.). Feminine personality and conflict. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1970. Pp. 31–44.
2.
FlemingM.CohenD.SaltP.RobinsonL.SpitzJ.The use of an animal drawing test in the assessment and disposition of transsexualism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, in press.
3.
FlemingM.KoocherG.NathansJ.Draw-A-Person Test: Implications for gender identification. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1979, 8, 55–61.
4.
GravitzM. A.Normal adult differentiation patterns on the figure drawing test. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1966, 30, 272–273.
5.
HeinrichP.TriebeJ. K.Sex preferences in children's human figure drawings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1972, 36, 263–267.
6.
KoccherG.SimmondsD. W.The Animal and Opposite Drawing Technique: Implications for personality assessment. International Journal of Symbology, 1971, 2, 9–12.
7.
SimmondsD. W.KoocherG.Perceptual rigidity in paranoid schizophrenia: Use of projective animal drawings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 37, 247–250.
8.
SwensonC.Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 20–44.
