121 undergraduates were tested on 12 single-solution anagrams. Each anagram had either a category-label prime, a list-item prime or no prime. Compared with the no-prime condition, both the category label and list-item primes produced a significant reduction in solution time. The list-item prime effect was restricted to anagrams that were difficult to solve as measured by bigram transitional probability. The conditional nature of the priming effect was discussed in terms of strategies for solution of anagrams.
References
1.
BattigW. F.MontagueW. F.Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: a replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 1969, 80, 1–46.
2.
DewingK.HetheringtonP.Anagram solving as a function of word imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102, 764–767.
3.
DominowskiR. L.EkstrandB. R.Direct and associative priming in anagram solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 74, 84–87.
4.
JablonskiE. M.MuellerJ. H.Anagram solution as a function of instructions, priming and imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 94, 84–89.
5.
KučeraH.FrancisW. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown Univer. Press, 1967.
6.
LewisM. Q.Categorized lists and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 87, 129–131.
7.
LewisM. Q.Cue effectiveness in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102, 737–739.
8.
MayznerM. S.TresseltM. E.Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1965, 1, 13–32.
9.
MendelsohnG. A.O'BrienA. T.The solution of anagrams: a reexamination of the effects of letter transitional probabilities, letter moves, and word frequency on anagram difficulty. Memory and Cognition, 1974, 2, 566–574.
