To find out if subjects' knowledge of the complex nature of obesity increases with age, 447 nursery school, first grade, fifth grade, and adult subjects were asked if they knew anyone fat and, if so, who; what the causes of obesity are; and whose fault it is if someone is fat. Older subjects were increasingly likely to know people who were fat and to give complex causal explanations for obesity; moreover, adults were less likely than children to see the fat individual as responsible for his obesity. Female subjects were more likely than males to know someone fat and to give complex explanations of obesity. Anglo, Hispanic, Native American and black subjects did not differ on any measure. Children who were underweight, of average weight or overweight also did not differ in knowledge or beliefs. The results suggest that, although accuracy of knowledge increases with age, education about obesity at all age levels may be needed to reduce incorrect beliefs and accompanying negative attitudes toward obesity.
References
1.
AllonN.The stigma of overweight in everyday life. In BrayG. A. (Ed.), Obesity in perspective. Vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975. Pp. 83–102. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 75-708).
2.
BernsteinA. C.CowanP. A.Children's concepts of how people get babies. Child Development, 1975, 46, 77–91.
3.
BrayG. A. (Ed.) Obesity in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Pp. 1–272. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 79-359).
4.
CahnmanW. J.The stigma of obesity. Sociological Quarterly, 1968, 9, 283–299.
5.
DeJongW.The stigma of obesity: The consequences of naive assumptions concerning the causes of physical deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1980, 81, 75–87.
6.
GarbJ. L.GarbJ. R.StunkardA. J.Social factors and obesity in Navajo Indian children. In HowardA. (Ed.), Recent advances in obesity research. London: Newman, 1975. Pp. 37–39.
7.
GoodmanNDornbuschS. M.RichardsonS. A.HastorfG. H.Variant reactions to physical disabilities. American Sociological Review, 1963, 28, 429–435.
8.
GulanickN.WoodburnL. T.RimmD. C.Weight gain through self-control procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 536–539.
9.
HarrisM. B.Educating students about obesity: An ounce of prevention, a pound of cure and a ton of prejudice. Health Education, in press.
10.
KannelW. B.GordonT.Physiological and medical concomitants of obesity: The Framingham study. In BrayG. A. (Ed.), Obesity in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Pp. 125–163. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 79-359).
11.
KiellN. (Ed.) The psychology of obesity. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1973.
12.
LernerR. M.The development of stereotyped expectancies of body build-behavior relations. Child Development, 1969, 40, 137–141.
13.
LernerR. M.The development of personal space schemata toward body build. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 84, 229–235.
14.
LernerR. M.KornS. J.The development of body-build stereotypes in males. Child Development, 1972, 43, 908–920.
15.
MaddoxG. L.BlackK. W.LiedermanV. R.Overweight as social deviance and disability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1968, 9, 287–298.
16.
MatthewsV.WestieC.A preferred method for obtaining rankings: Reactions to physical handicaps. American Sociological Review, 1966, 31, 851–854.
17.
Metropolitan Life. Recent growth trends in childhood and adolescence. Statistical Bulletin, 1973, 54, 8–9.
18.
NisbettR. E.Hunger, obesity, and the ventromedial hypothalamus. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 433–453.
19.
PenickS. B.StunkardA. J.Newer concepts of obesity. Medical Clinics of North America, 1970, 54, 745–754.
20.
RichardsonS. A.GoodmanN.HastorfA. H.DornbuschS. M.Cultural uniformity in reaction to physical handicaps. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 241–247.
RodinJ.Pathogenesis of obesity: Energy intake and expenditure. In BrayG. A. (Ed.), Obesity in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Pp. 37–68. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 79-359).
23.
RodinJ.Current status of the internal-external hypothesis for obesity: What went wrong?American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 361–372.
24.
SalansL. B.Natural history of obesity. In BrayG. A. (Ed.), Obesity in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Pp. 69–94. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 79-359).
25.
SchachterS.RodinJ.Obese humans and rats. Washington, D.C.: Erlbaum/Halstead, 1974.
26.
SelmanR. L.Social-cognitive understanding: A guide to educational and clinical practice. In LikonaT. (Ed.), Moral development and behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1979. Pp. 296–316.
27.
SimsE. A. H.Definitions, criteria and prevalence of obesity. In BrayG. A. (Ed.), Obesity in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Pp. 20–36. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 79-359).
28.
StaffieriJ. R.A study of social stereotype of body image in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 101–194.
29.
StunkardA. J.The pain of obesity. Palo Alto, CA: Bull, 1976.
30.
StunkardA. J.Obesity and the social environment: Current status, future prospects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977, 300, 298–320.
31.
U.S. Public Health Service.Weight, height, and selected body dimensions of adults: United States, 1960–1962. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965.
32.
Van ItallieT. B.Conservative approaches to treatment. In BrayG. A. (Ed.), Obesity in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979. Pp. 164–178. (DHEW Publication No. NIH 79-359).
33.
WooleyO. W.WooleyS. C.DyrenforthS. R.Obesity and women: II. A neglected feminist topic. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 1979, 2, 69–79.
34.
WooleyS. C.WooleyO. W.Obesity and women: I. A closer look at the facts. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 1979, 2, 81–92.
35.
WooleyS. C.WooleyO. W.DyrenforthS. R.Theoretical, practical and social issues in behavioral treatments of obesity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979, 12, 3–25.
