Three experiments demonstrated that ambiguous sentences lead to higher rates of verbatim recall than comparable nonambiguous sentences. Two variables which markedly influenced retention levels were presentation rate and subjects' expectation. The increased retention was obtained only if sufficient time to complete processing of the sentence was provided and only if the subjects were expecting ambiguous sentences. These experiments furnished further evidence for the importance of comprehension in memory for sentences.
References
1.
AubleP. M.FranksJ. J.The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall. Memory and Cognition, 1978, 6, 20–25.
2.
BransfordJ. D.FranksJ. J.The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 331–350.
3.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. K.Contextual prerequisites for understanding: some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 717–726.
4.
ClarkH. H.ClarkE. V.Psychology and language: an introduction to psycho-linguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.
5.
CraikF. I. M.TulvingE.Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 268–294.
6.
FossD. J.HakesD. T.Psycholinguistics: an introduction to the psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
7.
HolmesV. M.ArwasR.GarrettM. F.Prior context and the perception of ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 5, 103–110.
8.
MarksJ. E.MillerG. A.The role of semantic syntactic constraints in the memorization of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964, 3, 1–5.
