This study used attractiveness ratings of about 601 males and 745 females based on high school annual pictures to predict marital and socio-economic status 15 yr. later. Attractiveness gets females highly educated husbands with high income, but no benefits in occupational status or own income. It also reduces the probability of remaining unmarried. For males, attractiveness interferes with achievement of status.
References
1.
CliffordM.WalsterE.The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46, 248–258.
2.
DionK.BerscheidE.WalsterE.What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.
3.
DipboyeR. L.FromkinH. L.WibackK.Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 39–43.
4.
ElderG. H.Jr.Appearance and education in marriage mobility. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 519–533.
5.
HanksM.EcklandB. K.Athletics and social participation in the education attainment process. Sociology of Education, 1976, 43, 271–294.
6.
HolmesS. J.HatchC. E.Personal appearance as related to scholastic records and marriage selection in college women. Human Biology, 1938, 10, 65–76.
7.
MursteinB. I.Physical attractiveness and marital choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 8–12.
8.
SalviaJ.AlgozzineR.SheareJ. B.Attractiveness and school achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 1977, 15, 60–67.
9.
SparacinoJ.Physical attractiveness and occupational prestige among male college graduates. Psychological Reports, 1980, 47, 1275–1280.
10.
TaylorP. A.GlennN. D.The utility of education and attractiveness for females' status attainment through marriage. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 484–497.
11.
UdryJ. R.The importance of being beautiful: A re-examination and racial comparison. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 154–160.
