Awareness of Aggressive Response Contingencies When Using the Reaction-Time Research Task

Abstract

College students interacted via the Taylor reaction-time method of studying aggression with an opponent who attacked the subject with maximum shocks for six trials and switched to a matching strategy for 1, 6, or 12 additional trials. At the end of the task, subjects responded to a questionnaire that measured awareness of their own shock settings, the opponent's shock settings, and the relationship between shock settings made by the subject and those made by the opponent. While a statistically significant proportion of subjects correctly recalled the shock settings and relationships between shock settings, a substantial proportion of subjects did not. Results were discussed in relation to a “trade-off” between the use of “masking” tasks, such as the reaction-time procedure, to control subjects' response bias, and the risk that stimulus contingencies may be obscured by such “masking” tasks. One solution to the dilemma may be to replicate the findings both with and without a “masking” task.

References

Baron

R. A.

Human aggression. New York: Plenum, 1977.

Bertilson

H. S.

Methodology in the study of aggression. In Geen

R. G.

Donnerstein

E. I.

(Eds.), Human aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews. Vol. 1. Theoretical and methodological issues. New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. 213–245.

Bertilson

H. S.

Lien

S. K.

Comparison of reaction time and interpersonal communication tasks to test effectiveness of a matching strategy in reducing attack-instigated aggression. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 55, 659–665.

Bertilson

H. S.

Wonderlich

S. A.

Blum

M. W.

Withdrawal, matching, withdrawal-matching, and variable-matching strategies in reducing attack-instigated aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 1983, 9, 1–11.

Bertilson

H. S.

Wonderlich

S. A.

Blum

M. W.

Withdrawal and matching strategies in reducing attack-instigated aggression. Psychological Reports, 1984, 55, 823–828.

Campbell

D. T.

Prospective: Artifact and control. In Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 351–382.

Carlopio

Adair

J. G.

Lindsay

R. C. L.

Spinner

Avoiding artifact in the search for bias: The importance of assessing subjects' perceptions of the experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 693–701.

Dengerink

H. A.

Bertilson

H. S.

The reduction of attack-instigated aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 1974, 8, 254–262.

Harper

R. F.

The code of Hammurabi, King of Babylon. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1904.

10.

Kimble

C. E.

Fitz

Onorad

J. R.

Effectiveness of counteraggression strategies in reducing interactive aggression by males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 272–278.

11.

Orne

M. T.

Demand characteristics and the concept of quasi-control. In Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 143–179.

12.

Pisano

Taylor

S. P.

Reduction of physical aggression: The effects of four strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 237–242.

13.

Rosenberg

M. J.

The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. In Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 279–349.

14.

Sidowski

J. B.

Reward and punishment in a minimal social situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 318–326.

15.

Taylor

S. P.

The relationship of expressed and inhibited hostility to physiological activation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Massachusetts., 1965.