Criticisms and replies to criticisms are reviewed, making clear that new experiments designed to control situational factors and scores on Machiavellianism are required.
References
1.
JaffeE. D.NebenzahlI. D.GotesdynerH.Machiavellianism, task orientation, and team effectiveness revisitedPsychological Reports, 1989, 64, 819–824. (a).
2.
JaffeE. D.NebenzahlI. D.GotesdynerH.Personality and effective leadership: a reply. Psychological Reports, 1989, 65, 1377–1378. (b).
JonesR. E.Inconsistency of research results and researchers' responsibility. Psychological Reports, 1990, 66, 689–690.
5.
JonesR. E.WhiteC. S.Relationships between Machiavellianism, task orientation and team effectiveness. Psychological Reports, 1983, 53, 859–866.
6.
MontgomeryC.WernerfeltB.BalakrishnanS.Strategy content and the research process: a critique and commentary. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10, 189–197.
7.
NagelE.The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.
8.
PoincareJ. H.The science and the hypothesis. Paris: E. Flammarion, 1903.
9.
PopperK.The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
