Refining a Non-Kohlbergian Decision-Making Approach to the Production of Justifications for Moral Judgements

Abstract

This paper reports two studies primarily designed to refine understanding of the influence of interview topic on the proportions of major types of justifications for moral judgements encountered during moral judgement interviews. It was assumed that subjects will tend to report the use of information that supports their decisions when a definite decision is made and will report all kinds of relevant information when they are uncertain what to decide. It was suggested that for situations to which a well-known moral rule applies, when the rule is upheld, the rule will influence such proportions as different rules are valued for different reasons. When such a rule is rejected, the nature of the reason suggested for rejecting the rule will influence such proportions. When subjects are uncertain whether to support or reject a rule, such proportions will be influenced by both the rule and the reason suggesting rejection. These predictions were broadly verified, which was interpreted as supporting the suggested analysis of the influence of these aspects of the interview topic on proportions of major types of justification.

References

Cochran

W. G.

Cox

G. M.

(1957) Experimental designs. New York: Wiley.

Colby

Kohlberg

(1987) The measurement of moral judgement. Vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.

Cortese

A. J.

(1984) Standard issue scoring of moral reasoning: a critique. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 227–246.

Cortese

A. J.

(1987) The internal consistency of moral reasoning. Journal of Psychology, 121, 373–386.

Gibbs

J. C.

Widaman

K. F.

Colby

(1982) Construction and validation of a simplified, group-administerable equivalent of the moral judgement interview. Child Development, 53, 895–910.

Kohlberg

(1976) Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona

(Ed.), Moral development and behavior: theory, research and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Pp. 31–53.

Langford

P. E.

(1987) Moral judgement scoring manual. Melbourne: School of Education, La Trobe Univer., Australia.

Langford

P. E.

(1991) The assessment of moral autonomy within a multidimensional approach to the development of moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 20, 55–78.

Langford

P. E.

(in press) Depth of processing in moral judgement interviews. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs.

10.

Langford

P. E.

Claydon

L. F.

(1989) A non-Kohlbergian approach to the development of justifications for moral judgements. Educational Studies, 15, 261–279.

11.

Langford

P. E.

D'Cruz

J. V.

(1989) A new way of scoring moral judgment interviews. Journal of Moral Education, 18, 103–116.

12.

Rest

J. R.

(1983) Morality. In Flavell

J. H.

Markman

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3. Cognitive development. New York: Wiley. Pp. 236–284.

13.

Rest

J. R.

(1986) Moral development, advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

14.

Trainer

F. E.

(1982) Dimensions of moral thought. Sydney: Univer. of New South Wales Press.