Neuroethics vs Neurophysiologically and Neuropsychologically Uninformed Influences in Child-Rearing,Education,Emerging Hunter-Gatherers,and Artificial Intelligence Models of the Brain
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1993
Neuroethics vs Neurophysiologically and Neuropsychologically Uninformed Influences in Child-Rearing,Education,Emerging Hunter-Gatherers,and Artificial Intelligence Models of the Brain
Potentially negative long-term consequences in four areas are emphasized, if specific neuromaturational, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological facts within a neurodevelopmental and ecological context are neglected in normal functional levels of child development and maturational lag of the frontal lobe system in “Attention Deficit Disorder,” in education (reading/writing and arithmetic), in assessment of cognitive functioning in hunter-gatherer populations, specifically modified in the service of their survival, and in constructing computer models of the brain, neglecting consciousness and intentionality as criticized recently by Searle.
References
1.
EleftheriouB. E.BoehlkeK. W.Brain MAO in mice after exposure to aggression and defeat. Science, 1967, 155, 1693–1694.
2.
GleickJ.Genius: The life and science of Richard Feynman. New York: Pantheon, 1992. (a).
3.
GleickJ.Part showman, all genius. New York Times, Magazine, Sept. 20, 1992, 542(No. 49,95), Section 6, 39–44. (b).
4.
Goldman-RakicP. S.Setting the stage—neuro-development before birth. In FriedmanS. L.KlivingstonK. A.PetersonR. W. (Eds.), The brain, cognition and education. New York: Academic Press, 1986. Pp. 233–258.
5.
GottliebA.The lesson of the drunk and the streetlight. Book review of Searle: The rediscovery of the mind. New York Times, Book Review, Oct. 11, 1992, 542(No. 49,116), Section 7, 15–16.
6.
HeiderK. G.The Dugum Dani, a Papuan culture in the highlands of West New Guinea. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1970.
7.
KandelE. R.SchwartzJ. H.Principles of neural science. New York: Elsevier, 1985.
8.
KantI. [Foundations for the metaphysics of morals.]Berlin: Akademieausgabe, 1784.
9.
KantI. [The critique of pure reason.]Berlin: Akademieausgabe, 1787.
10.
KlineM.Why Johnny can't add: The failure of the new math. New York: St. Martin Press, 1973.
11.
LuriaA. R.The working brain. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
12.
LuriaA. R.Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
13.
PontiusA. A. [The subject-object relationship in concepts by Kant and Jung.] Kant-Studien, 1971, 62, 121–125.
14.
PontiusA. A.Neurological aspects in some type of delinquency, especially among juveniles, toward a neurological model of ethical action. Adolescence, 1972, 7, 289–309.
15.
PontiusA. A.Conceptual model of Minimal Brain Dysfunction, General discussion in Proceedings of Minimal Brain Dysfunction Conference in 1972. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, 205, 61–63. (a).
16.
PontiusA. A.Dysfunction patterns analogous to frontal lobe system and caudate nucleus syndromes in some groups of Minimal Brain Dysfunction. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association, 1973, 28, 285–290. (b).
17.
PontiusA. A.Neuro-ethics of “walking” in the newborn. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 37, 235–245. (c).
18.
PontiusA. A.Basis for a neurological test of frontal lobe system functioning up to adolescence. Adolescence, 1974, 9, 221–232.
19.
PontiusA. A.New frontiers of ecological ethics—a balance between over and under control of outer and inner factors. Experientia, 1975, 31, 263–264.
20.
PontiusA. A.Dyslexia and specifically distorted drawings of the face—a new subgroup with prosop-agnosia-like signs. Experientia, 1976, 32, 1432–1435. (a).
21.
PontiusA. A.Neuro-ethics: On the child's neuro-environment. In KnoetigH. (Ed.), Proceedings, International Meeting on Human Ecology in 1975. Vienna: Georgi Publ., 1976. Pp. 545–548. (b).
22.
PontiusA. A.Motor development from infancy. (Invited lecture) M. V. Ridenour, Chairperson, Conference on motor development. Temple Univer., Philadelphia, PA, June 22, 1978. (a).
23.
PontiusA. A.Neuro-environment and neuro-ethics, based on new model of subject-object determination, toward a new system, integrating concepts from Kant, philosophy of science and neuro-development. In KnoetigH. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Vienna International Meeting on Human Ecology in 1977. Vienna: Archivum Oecologiae Hominis, 1978. Pp. 145–154. (b).
24.
PontiusA. A.Links between literacy skills and accurate spatial relations in representations of the face: Comparison of preschoolers, school children, dyslexics, and mentally retarded. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1983, 57, 659–666.
25.
PontiusA. A.Representation of spatial relations on the specific test, Draw-A-Person-With-Face-In-Front. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 59, 275–284.
26.
PontiusA. A.Dyslexia subtype with simultaneous and faulty intra-object processing of spatial relations in an “ecological syndrome.”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1985, 61, 1107–1120.
27.
PontiusA. A.Color and spatial error in block design in stone-age Auca Indians: Ecological underuse of occipital-parietal system in men, of frontal lobes in women. Brain and Cognition, 1989, 10, 54–75.
28.
PontiusA. A.Cross-evolutionary spatial representation, commentary on J. B. Deregowski. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991, 14, 522–523. (a).
29.
PontiusA. A.Dyslexia-dysgraphia. In DulbeccoR. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1991. Vol. 3. Pp. 215–237. (b).
30.
PontiusA. A.Modification of grouped cortical functions—a model of evolutionary ecological neuropsychiatry. Integrative Psychiatry, 1991, 7, 184–193. (c).
31.
PontiusA. A.Spatial representation, modified by ecology from hunter-gatherers to city dwellers in Indonesia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1993, in press.
32.
PontiusA. A.RuttigerK. F.Frontal lobe system maturational lag in juvenile delinquents shown in Narrative Test. Adolescence, 1976, 11, 509–518.
33.
PontiusA. A.YudowitzB. S.Frontal lobe system dysfunction in some criminal actions as shown in the Narrative Test. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1980, 168, 111–117.
34.
RidenourM. V.Infant walkers: Developmental tool or inherent danger. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982. 55, 1201–1202.
35.
SearleJ. R.The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
36.
SeidenbergM. S.Cognitive neuropsychology and language, the state of the art. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1988, 5, 403–440.
37.
SimpkissM. V.RaikesA. J.Problems resulting from excessive use of baby-walkers and baby-bouncers. Lancet, 1972, 1, 747.
38.
WolfeG. M.The parallel guidance of visual attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1992, 1, 124–128.
39.
YakovlevP. I.LecoursA. R.The myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In MinkowskiA. (Ed.), Regional development of the brain in early life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1967. Pp. 3–70.
40.
ZambelliA. T.StammJ. S.MaitinskiS.LoiselleD. L.Auditory evoked potentials and selective attention in formerly hyperactive adolescent boys. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1977, 134, 742–747.
41.
ZametkinA. J.NordahlT. E.GrossM.KingA. C.SempleW. E.RumseyJ.HamburgerS.CohenR. M.Cerebral glucose metabolism in adults with hyperactivity of childhood onset. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 1361–1366.
42.
ZelazoP. R.KonnerM.KolbS.ZelazoN. A.Newborn walking: A reply to Pontius. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 39, 423–428.
43.
ZelazoP. R.ZelazoN. A.KolbS.“Walking” in the newborn. Science, 1972, 176, 314–315.
