Blocking in Pavlovian Conditioning: Effect of Prior Excitatory Conditioning to a Stimulus Extraneous to Compound Conditioning

Abstract

The effect of prior excitatory conditioning to a stimulus not included in the compound conditioning phase of the typical blocking experiment was assessed in three CER studies. The first experiment, in which rat subjects received A +, C +, or a combination of A + /C + trials prior to AB + conditioning, showed that A + /C + or C + training produced as robust blocking as A + training relative to a control group with no prior conditioning. A second experiment which was designed to assess the role of background cues in mediating the blocking effect indicated that background cues were not responsible for the A + or C + effects, while a third experiment showed these same effects were not mediated by stimulus generalization. The findings of these experiments are interpreted in the context of pseudoconditioning-induced rehearsal of a US representation in short-term memory.

References

Ayres

J. J.

Bombace

J. C.

(1982) A surprising extension of the preconditioned stimulus beyond cotermination of the US and the added element does not alleviate blocking to the added element. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 263–268.

Azorlosa

J. L.

Cicala

G. A.

(1986) Blocking of conditioned suppression with 1 or 10 compound trials. Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 163–167.

Baker

A. G.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1979) Preexposure to the CS alone, US alone, or CS and US uncorrelated: latent inhibition, blocking by context or learned irrelevance. Learning and Motivation, 10, 278–294.

Balaz

M. A.

Kasprow

W. J.

Miller

R. R.

(1982) Blocking with a single compound trial. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 271–276.

Blanchard

Honig

W. K.

(1976) Surprise value of food determines its effectiveness as a reinforcer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 67–74.

Dafters

Hetherington

McCartney

(1983) Blocking and sensory preconditioning effects in morphine analgesic tolerance: support for a Pavlovian conditioning model of drug tolerance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 35, 1–11.

Desiderato

(1964) Generalization of conditioned suppression. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57, 434–437.

DeVito

P. L.

Fowler

(1986) Effects of contingency violations on the extinction of a conditioned fear inhibitor and a conditioned fear excitor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 99–115.

DeVito

P. L.

Fowler

(1987) Enhancement of conditioned inhibition via an extinction treatment. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15, 448–454.

10.

Feldman

J. M.

(1971) Added cue control as a function of reinforcement predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 318–325.

11.

Fowler

(1978) Cognitive associations as evident in the blocking effects of response-contingent CSs. In Hulse

S. H.

Fowler

Honig

W. K.

(Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 109–153.

12.

Ganesau

Pearce

J. M.

(1988) Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 280–291.

13.

Goodman

J. H.

Fowler

(1983) Blocking and enhancement of fear conditioning by appetitive CSs. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 75–82.

14.

Gray

Appignanesi

A. A.

(1973) Compound conditioning: elimination of the blocking effect. Learning and Motivation, 4, 374–380.

15.

Grether

W. F.

(1938) Pseudo-conditioning without paired stimulation encountered in attempted backward conditioning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 91–96.

16.

Holland

P. C.

(1985) Pretraining a compound conditioned stimulus reduces unblocking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 237–240.

17.

Kamin

L. J.

(1968) “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In Jones

M. R.

(Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: aversive stimulation. Miami, FL: Univer. of Miami Press. Pp. 9–33.

18.

Kamin

L. J.

(1969) Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In Campbell

B. A.

Church

R. M.

(Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 279–296.

19.

Kirk

R. E.

(1968) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

20.

Kremer

Specht

Allen

(1980) Attenuation of blocking with the omission of a delayed US. Animal Learning and Behavior, 8, 609–616.

21.

LoLordo

V. M.

Ross

R. R.

(1987) Role of within-compound associations in occasion setting: a blocking analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 156–167.

22.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1975a) Blocking of conditioned suppression: role of the first compound trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 335–345.

23.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1975b) A theory of attention: variation in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.

24.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1976) Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4, 186–192.

25.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1978) Cognitive or association theories of conditioning: implications of an analysis of blocking. In Hulse

S. H.

Fowler

Honig

W. K.

(Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 155–175.

26.

Mackintosh

N. J.

Honig

W. K.

(1970) Blocking and attentional enhancement in pigeons. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 73, 78–85.

27.

Miles

C. G.

(1970) Blocking the acquisition of control by an auditory stimulus with pretraining on brightness Psychonomic Science, 19, 133–134.

28.

Neely

J. H.

Wagner

A. R.

(1974) Attenuation of blocking with shifts in reward: the involvement of schedule-generated contextual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 751–763.

29.

Pearce

J. M.

Hall

(1980) A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.

30.

Randich

(1981) The US preexposure phenomenon in the conditioned suppression paradigm: a role for conditioned situational stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 12, 321–341.

31.

Randich

LoLordo

V. M.

(1979) Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 523–548.

32.

Rescorla

R. A.

Colwill

R. M.

(1983) Within-compound associations in unblocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 390–400.

33.

Rescorla

R. A.

Wagner

A. R.

(1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black

A. H.

Prokasy

W. H.

(Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 64–99.

34.

Revusky

(1971) The role of interference in association over a delay. In Honig

W. K.

James

P. H. R.

(Eds.), Animal memory. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 155–213.

35.

Schachtman

T. R.

Gee

Kasprow

W. J.

Miller

R. R.

(1983) Reminder-induced recovery from blocking as a function of the number of compound trials. Learning and Motivation, 14, 154–164.

36.

Schull

(1979) A conditioned opponent theory of Pavlovian conditioning and habituation. In Bower

G. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 13. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 57–89.

37.

Soltysik

S. S.

(1983) Blocking of inhibitory conditioning within a serial conditioned stimulus-conditioned inhibitor compound: maintenance of acquired behavior without an unconditioned stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 14, 1–29.

38.

St. Claire-Smith

R. J.

(1970) Blocking of punishment. Paper presented at the meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City, NJ.

39.

St. Claire-Smith

R. J.

(1979) The overshadowing and blocking of punishment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 51–61.

40.

Stickney

K. J.

Donahoe

J. W.

(1983) Attenuation of blocking by a change in US focus. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 60–66.

41.

Suiter

R. D.

LoLordo

V. M.

(1971) Blocking of inhibitory Pavlovian conditioning in the conditioned emotional response procedure. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 76, 137–144.

42.

vom Saal

Jenkins

H. M.

(1970) Blocking the development of stimulus control. Learning and Motivation, 1, 52–64.

43.

Wagner

A. R.

(1969) Stimulus selection and a “modified continuity theory.” In Bower

G. H.

Spence

J. T.

(Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 1–40.

44.

Wagner

A. R.

(1978) Expectancies and the priming of STM. In Hulse

S. H.

Fowler

Honig

W. K.

(Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 177–210.

45.

Wagner

A. R.

Larew

M. B.

(1985) Opponent processes and Pavlovian inhibition. In Miller

R. R.

Spear

N. E.

(Eds.), Information processing in animals: conditioned inhibition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 223–265.

46.

Wagner

A. R.

Mazur

J. E.

Donnegan

N. H.

Pfaultz

P. L.

(1980) Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 376–385.

47.

Wickens

D. D.

Wickens

C. D.

(1942) Some factors related to pseudoconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 518–526.

48.

Willner

(1978) Blocking of a taste aversion by prior pairings of exteroceptive stimuli without illness. Learning and Motivation, 9, 125–140.