Organizational researchers widely accept the 1957 work of Gouldner describing the influence of cosmopolitan-local “latent roles” on various organizational outcome variables. New cosmopolitan and local scales were described here for further research.
References
1.
CornwallJ. R.GrimesA. J. (1987) Cosmopolitan-local: A cross-lagged correlation analysis of the relationship between professional role orientations and behaviors in an academic organization. Human Relations, 40, 281–298.
2.
GoldbergA. I. (1976) The relationship of cosmopolitan/local orientations to professional values and behavior. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 3, 331–372.
3.
GouldnerA. W. (1957) Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles—I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 281–306.
4.
GrimesA. J.BergerP. K. (1970) Cosmopolitan-local: Evaluation of the construct. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 407–416.
5.
RaelinJ. A. (1989) Professional and business ethics: Bridging the gap. Management Review, November, 39–42.
6.
TumaN. B.GrimesA. J. (1981) A comparison of models of role orientations of professionals in a research-oriented university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 187–206.
7.
WrightT. A.LarwoodL.DohertyE. M. (1996) Use and misuse of the psychological contract: Reflections on an academic case. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 216–220.
