Detecting Latent Taxa: Monte Carlo Comparison of Taxometric,Mixture Model,and Clustering Procedures

Abstract

A Monte Carlo evaluation of four procedures for detecting taxonicity was conducted using artificial data sets that were either taxonic or nontaxonic. The data sets were analyzed using two of Meehl's taxometric procedures, MAXCOV and MAMBAC, Ward's method for cluster analysis in concert with the cubic clustering criterion and a latent variable mixture modeling technique. Performance of the taxometric procedures and latent variable mixture modeling were clearly superior to that of cluster analysis in detecting taxonicity. Applied researchers are urged to select from the better procedures and to perform consistency tests.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike

(1987) Factor analysis and the AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

Arabie

Hubert

L. J.

DeSoete

(1996) Clustering and classification. Singapore: World Scientific Press.

Cleland

Haslam

(1996) Robustness of taxometric analysis with skewed indicators: I. A Monte Carlo study of the MAMBAC procedure. Psychological Reports, 79, 243–248.

Cleveland

W. S.

Devlin

S. J.

(1988) Locally-weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 596–610.

Everitt

B. S.

(1981) A Monte Carlo investigation of the likelihood ratio test for the number of components in a mixture of normal distributions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 171–180.

Everitt

B. S.

Hand

D. J.

(1981) Finite mixture distributions. New York: Chapman & Hall.

Gangestad

S. W.

Snyder

(1985) “To carve nature at its joints”: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317–349.

Gibbons

R. D.

Dorus

Ostrow

D. G.

Pandey

G. N.

Davis

J. M.

Levy

D. L.

(1984) Mixture distributions in psychiatric research. Biological Psychiatry, 19, 935–961.

Golden

Meehl

P. E.

(1980) Detection of biological sex: An empirical test of cluster methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 475–496.

10.

Grove

W. M.

(1991) Validity of taxometric inferences based on cluster analysis stopping rules. In Grove

W. M.

Cicchetti

(Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology. Vol. 2. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press. Pp. 313–329.

11.

Grove

W. M.

Meehl

P. E.

(1993) Simple regression-based procedures for taxometric investigations. Psychological Reports, 73, 707–737.

12.

Harris

G. T.

Rice

M. E.

Quinsey

V. L.

(1994) Psychopathy as a taxon: Evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 387–397.

13.

Haslam

(1994) Categories of social relationship. Cognition, 53, 59–90.

14.

Haslam

(1997) Evidence that male sexual orientation is a matter of degree. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 862–870.

15.

Haslam

Bornstein

B. H.

(1996) Envy and jealousy as discrete emotions: A taxometric analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 255–272.

16.

Heinen

(1996) Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Jöreskog

Sörbom

(1988) LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS.

18.

MacLean

C. J.

Morton

N. E.

Elston

R. C.

Yee

(1976) Skewness in commingled distributions. Biometrics, 32, 695–699.

19.

Meehl

P. E.

(1992) Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.

20.

Meehl

P. E.

(1995) Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266–275.

21.

Meehl

P. E.

(1999) Clarifications about taxometric method. Journal of Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 165–174.

22.

Meehl

P. E.

Yonce

L. J.

(1994) Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and means below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports, 74, 1059–1274.

23.

Meehl

P. E.

Yonce

L. J.

(1996) Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports, 78, 1091–1227.

24.

Milligan

G. W.

(1981) A review of Monte Carlo tests of cluster analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 379–407.

25.

Milligan

G. W.

Cooper

M. C.

(1985) An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.

26.

Muthén

(1998) Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

27.

Price

R. A.

Stunkard

A. J.

(1989) Commingling analysis of obesity in twins. Human Heredity, 39, 121–135.

28.

Sarle

W. S.

(1983) Cubic clustering criterion. (Technical Report A-108) Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

29.

Stern

H. S.

Arcus

Kagan

Rubin

D. B.

Snidman

(1995) Using mixture models in temperament research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 407–423.

30.

Waller

N. G.

Meehl

P. E.

(1998) Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

31.

Waller

N. G.

Putnam

F. W.

Carlson

E. B.

(1996) Types of dissociation and dissociative types: A taxometric analysis of dissociative experiences. Psychological Methods, 1, 300–321.

32.

Ward

J. H.

(1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.