Validation of the Japanese Version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Large Community Sample

Abstract

The NEO Five-Factor Inventory is the shortened version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the shortened version in the general population of Japan. This version was translated into Japanese and then administered to 2,051 adults in a rural town in Akita Prefecture. A total of 1,664 (81.1%) individuals gave valid answers. Internal reliability, assessed by Cronbach alpha for subscales, ranged from .60 to .77. The scales were only weakly correlated both with each other and with age. In a multiple regression analysis, only the Neuroticism scale score was a significant predictor of scores on the General Health Questionnaire. Factor analysis supported the theoretical structure of personality. Overall, the Japanese version showed good reliability and validity in this sample of the general population of Japan.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Costa

P. T.

Jr. McCrae

R. R.

(1988) Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. McCrae

R. R.

(1989) The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

Fukunishi

(1990) [The assessment of cut-off point of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) in the Japanese version]. Shinri-rinsho, 3, 228–234. [in Japanese]

Goldberg

D. P.

Williams

(1988) A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

Marshall

G. N.

Wortman

C. B.

Vickers

R. R.

Jr. Kusulas

J. W.

Hervig

L. K.

(1994) The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 278–286.