Much research within decision-making has used the standard gambling paradigm where decision outcomes depend only on chance. Many real life decisions, however simply personal control over decision outcomes. This paper addressed the question of how internal controllability influences decision-making. Internal controllability is assumed (i) to enhance unrealistic optimism and (ii) to result in a better cost:benefit ratio. Both tendencies support each other and predict an enhanced attractiveness for internal and controllable choice options. Participants read a scenario and made a decision afterwards. Results supported the prediction: decision-makers take the option they can personally control. This finding widens the narrow perspective inherent in much previous research based on the gambling paradigm.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1957) Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.
2.
BellD. E. (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33, 1–27.
3.
BrandstätterE.KrizW. C. (in press) Hedonic intensity of disappointment and elation. The Journal of Psychology.
4.
BrandstätterE.KühbergerA. (2001) Probability weighting as a non-compensatory process. (Unpublished manuscript, Johannes Kepler University of Linz)
5.
BrandstätterE.KuhbergerA.SchneiderF. (in press) A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
ErevI.WallstenT. S.BudescuD. V. (1994) Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: the role of error in judgement processes. Psychological Review, 101, 519–527.
8.
GigerenzerG.HoffrageU.KleinböltingH. (1991) Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506–528.
9.
HeathC.TverskyA. (1991) Preference and belief: ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 5–28.
10.
KingdonJ. W. (1967) Politicians' beliefs about voters. American Political Science Review, 61, 137–145.
11.
LoomesG.SugdenR. (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92, 805–824.
12.
LoomesG.SugdenR. (1986) Disappointment and dynamic inconsistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271–282.
13.
MellersB. A.SchwartzA.HoK.RitovI. (1997) Decision affect theory: emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429.
14.
MellersB. A.SchwartzA.RitovI. (1999) Emotion based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345.
15.
MillerD. T.RossM. (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.
16.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988) Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.
17.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1994) Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.
18.
ThompsonS. C.ArmstrongW.ThomasC. (1998) Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 143–161.
19.
TverskyA.SattahS.SlovicP. (1988) Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.
20.
Van DijkW. W.ZeelenbergM.Van der PligtJ. (1999) Not having what you want versus having what you do not want: the impact of type of negative outcome on the experience of disappointment and related emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 129–148.
21.
WeinsteinN. D. (1980) Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.
22.
ZeelenbergM.BeattieJ.Van der PligtJ.De VriesN. K. (1996) Consequences of regret aversion: effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148–158.
23.
ZeelenbergM.Van DijkW. W.MansteadA. S. R.Van der PligtJ. (1998) The experience of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 221–230.
24.
ZeelenbergM.Van DijkW. W.Van der PligtJ.MansteadA. S. R.Van EmpelenP.ReindermanD. (1998) Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: the role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117–141.
