Introversion–Extra Version,Tempo,and Guided Imagery

Abstract

This research tested the hypotheses that (a) introverts would produce more vivid imagery than would extraverts, and (b) introverts would produce better mental imagery if the background auditory tempo was slow, and extraverts would produce better mental imagery of the background auditory tempo was fast. Participants (N = 240) were classified as introverts or extraverts and were randomly assigned one of three tempo conditions: slow, fast, or none. They were instructed to form mental images while listening individually to one of two stories Clicks (slow or fast) sounded in the background during the stories. All participants then completed detailed questionnaires about the vividness of their mental imagery. Analysis showed that introverts reported significantly more vividness in their imagery than did extraverts. The hypothesized interaction between personality and tempo was not found. Implications were drawn for therapeutic applications of mental imagery.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

J. B.

Hawley

C. W.

(1982) Study habits and Eysenck's theory of extraversion–introversion. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 139–146.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. McCrae

R. R.

(1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dienstfrey

(1991) Where the mind meets the body: Type A, the relaxation response, psychoneuroimmunology, biofeedback, neuropeptides, hypnosis, imagery and the search for the mind's effect on physical health. New York: HarperCollins.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1971) Readings in extraversion–introversion: 3. Bearings on basic psychological processes. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Ferraro

F. R.

(1993) Large-scale demonstration experiment of mental imagery ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1089–1090.

Geen

R. G.

(1984) Preferred stimulation levels in introverts and extraverts: effects on arousal and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 1303–1312.

Gralton

M. A.

Hayes

Y. A.

Richardson

T. E.

(1979) Introversion–extraversion and mental imagery. Journal of Mental Imagery, 3, 1–10.

Honeycutt

J. M.

Zagacki

K. S.

Edwards

(1992–1993) Imagined interaction, conversational sensitivity and communication competence. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality, 12, 139–157.

Huckabee

M. W.

(1974) Introversion–extraversion and imagery. Psychological Reports, 34, 453–454.

10.

Jung

C. G.

(1933) Psychological types. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

11.

Koelega

H. S.

(1992) Extraversion and vigilance performance: 30 years of inconsistencies. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 239–258.

12.

Lusebrink

V. B.

(1990) Imagery and visual expression in therapy. New York: Plenum.

13.

Martin

Williams

(1990) Imagery and emotion: clinical and experimental approaches. In Hampson

P. J.

Marks

D. F.

(Eds.), Imagery: current developments. London: Routledge. Pp. 268–306.

14.

McKinney

C. H.

Tims

F. C.

(1995) Differential effects of selected classical music on the imagery of high versus low imagers: two studies. Journal of Music Therapy, 32, 22–45.

15.

Pedhazur

E. J.

(1982) Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction. (2nd ed.) Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

16.

Sachs

B. C.

(1992) Coping with cancer. Stress Medicine, 8, 167–170.

17.

Stelmack

R. M.

(1990) Biological bases of extraversion: psychophysiological evidence. Journal of Personality, 58, 293–311.

18.

Stratton

V. N.

Zalanowski

A. H.

(1991–1992) The interfering effects of music with imagery. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality, 11, 381–388.

19.

Suinn

R. M.

(1997) Mental practice in sport psychology: where have we been, and where do we go? Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 4, 189–207.

20.

Syrjala

K. L.

Abrams

J. R.

(1996) Hypnosis and imagery in the treatment of pain. In Gatchel

R. J.

Turk

D. C.

(Eds.), Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford. Pp. 231–258.

21.

Van Dyne

W. T.

Stava

L. J.

(1981) Analysis of relationships among hypnotic susceptibility, personality type, and vividness of mental imager)'. Psychological Reports, 48, 23–26.

22.

Wallace

Turosky

D. D.

(1996) Imagery, hypnosis, and hemispheric laterality: an examination of individual differences. In Kunzendorf

R. G.

Spaños

N. P.

(Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination. Amityville, NY: Baywood. Pp. 235–252.

23.

Wisocki

P. A.

(1973) A covert reinforcement program for the treatment of test anxiety: a brief report. Behavior Therapy, 4, 264–266.