Erratum for Osato and Ogawa (2003)

Readers' attention is drawn to Table 1 of the paper by Osato and Ogawa (2003, p. 759) wherein analyses of variance for mean heart rates and mean increment from initial resting baseline in interview situations are summarized. An error in alignment of all F ratios for heart rate for the Source of Variance, Parts, is corrected by moving each F ratio down one line, e.g., the F ratio of 57.44 should align with Parts and the F ratio for Classmate/nonclassmate × Parts is 2.02.

See the correctly reprinted Table 1 on the following page

Table 1

Analyses of Variance For Mean Heart Rates and Mean Increment From Initial Resting Baseline in Interview Situations

Source	df	Heart Rate		Increment/Baseline
		MS	F	MS	F
Between Subjects Familiarity
Classmate/nonclassmate	1	1320.10	1.13	308.08	1.22
Three seating positions	2	8108.43	6.92†	535.67	2.12
Classmate/nonclassmate × Three seating positions	2	3173.13	2.71	1129.13	4.46*
Error	36	1171.33		252.96
Within Subjects Role
Interviewer/interviewee	1	1312.76	1.55	65.01	0.34
Classmate/nonclassmate × Interviewer/interviewee	1	3536.83	4.18*	245.63	1.30
Three seating positions × Interviewer/interviewee	2	64.51	0.08	48.59	0.26
Classmate/nonclassmate × Three seating positions × Interviewer/interviewee	2	914.17	1.08	147.29	0.78
Error	36	846.56		189.69
Parts	7	1628.78	57.44†	1628.63	49.16†
Classmate/nonclassmate × Parts	7	57.20	2.02	57.21	1.73
Three seating positions × Parts	14	38.66	1.36	38.74	1.17
Classmate/nonclassmate × Three seating positions × Parts	14	40.71	1.44	40.71	1.23
Error	252	28.36		33.13
Interviewer/interviewee × Parts	7	78.20	3.93†	78.13	5.18†
Classmate/nonclassmate × Interviewer/interviewee × Parts	7	32.08	1.61	32.27	2.14*
Three seating positions × Interviewer/interviewee × Parts	14	19.15	0.96	19.16	1.27
Classmate/nonclassmate × Three seating positions × Interviewer/interviewee × Parts	14	15.26	0.77	15.22	1.01
Error	252	19.89		15.09